bold = Main text
   Book, Chapter        grey = Comment text

 1   Int,        3     |         written elsewhere. In 1911 Harnack took up the subject, and
 2   Int,        3     |        With regard to the answers, Harnack accepts the theory of a
 3   Int,        4     | Neoplatonist philosopher, but even Harnack admits that they are borrowed
 4   Int,        4     |          the sword of persecution. Harnack has given unintentional
 5   Int,        6     |          to decide with certainty. Harnack has evolved an elaborate
 6   Int,        6     |          200 years" into "300" (as Harnack suggested), and making the
 7   Int,        6     |            the questions, to which Harnack has called attention. It
 8   III          (108)|     without a strength of its own. Harnack says that this mixed style
 9   III          (127)|          omitted before e0xrhn, as Harnack does. (Op. cit., p. 36.)~ ~
10   III          (177)|         attack on S. Peter begins. Harnack (op. cit. p. 103 et seq.)
11   III          (177)|        beginning and end are lost, Harnack reconstruct? the two parts
12   III          (219)|           book affords, as against Harnack's belief that the writer
13    IV          (259)|                                  2 Harnack has used this as an argument