Part,  Chapter, Paragraph

 1   II,     5.  4.Acr|     Outcomes~DDD~Defined Daily Dose~DRG~Diagnosis Related Groups~
 2   II,     5.  4.  2|           Diagnosis Related Groups (DRG), has favoured consistent
 3   IV,    11.  1.  6| overspending is not penalized). The DRG payment system was first
 4   IV,    11.  1.  6|     challenges arise in designing a DRG system to ensure patients
 5   IV,    11.  1.  6|       patients into a higher paying DRG (Busse et al, 2006).~ ~DRGs
 6   IV,    11.  1.  6|             the initial US Medicare DRG system have been translated
 7   IV,    11.  1.  6|         countries having introduced DRG systems, and with different
 8   IV,    11.  1.  6|             developed alongside the DRG system (HOPE - European
 9   IV,    11.  1.  6|           2006).~ ~The success of a DRG system depends on the incentives
10   IV,    11.  1.  6|           with policy objectives. A DRG system is associated to
11   IV,    11.  1.  6|         upgrade the severity of the DRG to increase reimbursement.
12   IV,    11.  1.  6|             on an adaptation of the DRG system combined with a global
13   IV,    11.  1.  6|       actual and expected activity: DRG payments are combined with
14   IV,    11.  1.  6|             and modification of the DRG systems vary across Europe.
15   IV,    11.  1.  6|         methodology used to develop DRG systems in 9 European countries (
16   IV,    11.  1.  6|             by the average cost per DRG, while in other countries,
17   IV,    11.  1.  6|           while in other countries, DRG cost weights are used. Whether
18   IV,    11.  1.  6|   technologies.~ ~The impact of the DRG hospital financing systems