Part, Chapter, Paragraph
1 -, 1 | health through selected indicators and their trends mainly
2 -, 1 | the evolution of health indicators, and related Community and
3 -, 1 | definitions and measurement of key indicators and data coverage inevitably
4 I, 2. 4 | Lisbon strategy.~ ~Good indicators of the wealth differences
5 I, 2. 10. 1| far, there are still no indicators for the implementation of
6 I, 2. 10. 1| genomics into public health. Indicators and statistical material
7 I, 2. 10. 1| effects.~The future use of indicators and health statistics will
8 I, 2. 10. 1| individualisation in healthcare systems. Indicators and statistics can only
9 I, 3. 3 | smaller.~ ~Obviously all other indicators are in accordance with this
10 II, 4. 1 | led to the development of indicators of health expectancies,
11 II, 4. 1 | expectancy (DFLE). These indicators represent the increasing
12 II, 4. 1 | indicator among the Structural Indicators. HLY is the first EU Structural
13 II, 4. 1 | 50 and 65) as key health indicators for the EU27 in addition
14 II, 4. 1 | Details on the HLY, Structural Indicators and the Lisbon Strategy
15 II, 4. 1 | the European Structural Indicators is to allow a fair assessment
16 II, 4. 1 | and ensuring that common indicators between the EU and the USA
17 II, 4. 1 | these simple and robust indicators to monitor the quality of
18 II, 4. 1 | higher expectations of these indicators. In order to be ready to
19 II, 4. 1 | summary measures, true period indicators (using incidence in place
20 II, 4. 3 | region. Mainstreaming Ageing. Indicators to Monitor Sustainable Progress
21 II, 4. 3 | Creating a coherent set of indicators to monitor health across
22 II, 4. 3 | Creating a coherent set of indicators to monitor health across
23 II, 5. 2.Acr| European Cardiovascular Indicators Surveillance Set~EUROSTAT~
24 II, 5. 2. 2| European Cardiovascular Indicators Surveillance Set - (h p,
25 II, 5. 2. 2| European Cardiovascular Indicators Surveillance Set - (h p,
26 II, 5. 2. 6| comparability of disease indicators. All these factors may have
27 II, 5. 2. 7| in Europe: are morbidity indicators comparable?: Results from
28 II, 5. 3. 1| Baili et al, 2003).~ ~Main indicators to describe the evolution
29 II, 5. 3. 1| related to macro-social indicators and lifestyles (Micheli,
30 II, 5. 3. 1| this chapter cancer outcome indicators are ordered by country specific
31 II, 5. 3. 2| following data:~- early indicators: screen-detected incidence
32 II, 5. 3. 2| screening programmes;~- impact indicators: down-staging of incident
33 II, 5. 3. 2| collection of data on defined indicators, developing recommendations
34 II, 5. 3. 3| this reason cancer outcome indicators (i.e. incidence, mortality,
35 II, 5. 3. 7| of updated and reliable indicators is essential.~ ~
36 II, 5. 3. 9| of European cancer health indicators. Eur J Public Health 13(
37 II, 5. 4.Acr| European Community Health Indicators~ESRF~End Stage Renal Failure~
38 II, 5. 4.Acr| Diabetes~EUCID~European Core Indicators for Diabetes Mellitus~FEND~
39 II, 5. 4. 1| be usefully targeted as indicators of the development of diabetes.
40 II, 5. 4. 2| basis of average national indicators (e.g. blood pressure increase
41 II, 5. 4. 2| adopt different sets of indicators, an aspect that still limits
42 II, 5. 4. 2| a common set of targets (indicators) that can be conveniently
43 II, 5. 4. 2| of processes and outcomes indicators.~The OECD basic set of quality
44 II, 5. 4. 2| OECD basic set of quality indicators undoubtedly reflect the
45 II, 5. 4. 2| showing that a large number of indicators may result into an ambitious
46 II, 5. 4. 2| of fact, out of only nine indicators judged to be immediately
47 II, 5. 4. 2| which have included target indicators as a basis for budgeting.
48 II, 5. 4. 2| collection on a range of indicators (of which several for diabetes)
49 II, 5. 4. 2| Framework.~ ~Table 5.4.2. OECD indicators~ ~ ~Areas~ ~Indicator Name~
50 II, 5. 4. 2| collected, meaning that most indicators cannot be estimated using
51 II, 5. 4. 2| short-list of core and secondary indicators that is now given considerable
52 II, 5. 4. 2| Table 5.4.3. EUDIP core indicators and their availability in
53 II, 5. 4. 2| Table 5.4.4. EUDIP secondary indicators and their availability in
54 II, 5. 4. 2| included in the list of indicators fit for international comparisons.~
55 II, 5. 4. 3| referring to the latest indicators results published in the
56 II, 5. 4. 3| and the core and secondary indicators published in the final EUCID
57 II, 5. 4. 3| Across 11 countries, the indicators varied between 3 (Belgium)
58 II, 5. 4. 3| across Europe.~ ~Secondary Indicators~ ~In terms of clinical management
59 II, 5. 4. 4| alarming rate. The EUCID core indicators are definitely the best
60 II, 5. 4. 4| diabetes.~As far as secondary indicators are concerned, it is worth
61 II, 5. 4. 4| through a long list of process indicators, showing that, despite the
62 II, 5. 4. 4| Overall, process and outcome indicators in diabetes seem to highlight
63 II, 5. 4. 6| reproducible and comparable indicators within the EU has become
64 II, 5. 4. 6| requires carefully selected indicators, which should meet the usual
65 II, 5. 4. 6| list of core and secondary indicators. The project aimed at “establishing
66 II, 5. 4. 6| aimed at “establishing the indicators for monitoring diabetes
67 II, 5. 4. 6| national level. The set of indicators released at the end of the
68 II, 5. 4. 6| comparability of national indicators is far from straightforward.
69 II, 5. 4. 6| subsequent “European Core Indicators in Diabetes” (EUCID) project
70 II, 5. 4. 6| allowed to collect EUDIP indicators in 20 European countries,
71 II, 5. 4. 6| limited availability of all indicators, but also forming the basis
72 II, 5. 4. 6| the production of EUCID indicators has now been passed to the
73 II, 5. 4. 6| targets for all process indicators reported in section 5.4.
74 II, 5. 4. 6| for most quality of care indicators the gold standard to achieve
75 II, 5. 4. 7| system to produce online indicators, including the EUCID shortlist,
76 II, 5. 4. 7| level); and~· risk-adjusted indicators (epidemiology, process quality,
77 II, 5. 4. 8| Report, Health Care Quality Indicators Project, Health Working
78 II, 5. 4. 8| European Union diabetes indicators. European Journal of Public
79 II, 5. 4. 8| Mattke S (2004): Selecting Indicators for the quality of Diabetes
80 II, 5. 5. 1| database includes seven indicators related to mental health.
81 II, 5. 5. 1| also general mental health indicators like mortality and potential
82 II, 5. 5. 1| Reliable and comparable indicators to monitor mental health
83 II, 5. 5. 1| of a Set of Mental Health Indicators for European Union (1999-
84 II, 5. 5. 1| Union (1999-2001) provided indicators derived from statistical
85 II, 5. 5. 1| surveys, and consisted of indicators of health status, determinants
86 II, 5. 5. 1| final set of mental health indicators and proposed a system to
87 II, 5. 5. 3| reviewed. The review analysed indicators such as mortality (death,
88 II, 5. 5. 3| schizophrenia (IMS 2003).~ ~ ~Health indicators usually used have limited
89 II, 5. 5. 3| hospital admission rates as indicators for prevalence - as well
90 II, 5. 5. 3| policies but are probably indicators for the gap between guideline
91 II, 5. 6. 2| Series 919 (WHO TRS 919)~· Indicators for Monitoring Musculoskeletal
92 II, 5. 6. 2| European Commission (2003): Indicators for Monitoring Musculoskeletal
93 II, 5. 6. 3| European Commission (2003): Indicators for Monitoring Musculoskeletal
94 II, 5. 6. 4| European Commission (2003): Indicators for Monitoring Musculoskeletal
95 II, 5. 6. 4| European Commission (2003): Indicators for Monitoring Musculoskeletal
96 II, 5. 6. 6| European Commission (2003): Indicators for Monitoring Musculoskeletal
97 II, 5. 7. 5| electronically reported four quality indicators. Since the beginning of
98 II, 5. 7. 5| of clinical performance indicators in RRT comparable at international
99 II, 5. 7. 6| on clinical performance indicators in RRT. The availability
100 II, 5. 7. 6| of clinical performance indicators, the development of techniques
101 II, 5. 7. 6| the American population. Indicators on these goals are currently
102 II, 5. 9. 5| operational performance indicators; and agree on and gain consensus
103 II, 5. 11. 5| core and extended sets of indicators and case studies, including
104 II, 5. 14.Acr| European Global Oral health Indicators Project~
105 II, 5. 14. 2| Poland and Portugal.~ ~The indicators, issue from the EGOHID I
106 II, 5. 14. 5| integration of oral health indicators in any health surveillance
107 II, 5. 14. 5| resulted in a deluge of indicators overwhelming health services
108 II, 5. 14. 5| of a profusion of health indicators, operating a selection is
109 II, 5. 14. 5| European Global Oral Health Indicators (www. egohid.eu). The objectives
110 II, 5. 14. 5| identify basic oral health indicators for a European surveillance
111 II, 5. 14. 5| establishment of the major indicators of reference. A core group
112 II, 5. 14. 5| core group of oral health indicators is being designed for integration
113 II, 5. 14. 5| national health systems. The indicators will focus in particular
114 II, 5. 14. 8| European Global Oral Health Indicators Development Project. 2003
115 II, 5. 14. 8| European Global Oral Health Indicators Development. The Challenge.
116 II, 5. 14. 8| European Global Oral Health Indicators Development Project. 2003
117 II, 6. 1 | based on available data and indicators about the trends of the
118 II, 7.Acr | European Community Health Indicators~ECMT~European Conference
119 II, 7. 2. 2| options to calculate diverse indicators on the basis of the hospital
120 II, 7. 2. 8| and health data. Important indicators to inform and monitor development
121 II, 7. 2. 8| Survey (ECHIS) selected indicators on injuries are collected.~htt ~ ~
122 II, 7. 2. 9| The delivery of reliable indicators with the existing data sources
123 II, 7. 3. 1| medically treated cases”). Also, indicators on health care consumption (
124 II, 7. 3. 4| IDB provides a variety of indicators on hospital treated injuries,
125 II, 7. 4 | is a proposal for health indicators which can be calculated
126 II, 7. 4 | and reasonably comparable indicators (mostly based on assessment
127 II, 7. 4 | structured inventory of important indicators , which are not yet widely
128 II, 7. 4 | also contain several injury indicators defining the European standard
129 II, 7. 4 | European standard of injury indicators.~(See: htt ~ ~Injury surveillance
130 II, 7. 4 | calculate the standard injury indicators. Only some of the data presented
131 II, 7. 5 | internationally comparable national indicators, e.g. on disabilities and
132 II, 7. 6 | self-harm. Also the question of indicators for health costs and disability
133 II, 8. 2. 1| evidence and to develop health indicators permitting comparable health
134 II, 8. 2. 1| intellectual disabilities. Health indicators are essential in order to
135 II, 8. 2. 1| The ECHI project: Health Indicators for the European Community.
136 II, 8. 2. 1| 2007): Developing health indicators for people with intellectual
137 II, 8. 2. 1| Valk HMJ (2003): Health indicators for people with intellectual
138 II, 8. 2. 1| Developing a set of health indicators for people with intellectual
139 II, 9. 1. 1| covered by the EURO-PERISTAT indicators on morbidity, including
140 II, 9. 1. 1| use of perinatal health indicators. Today, perinatal, infant
141 II, 9. 1. 1| among the most commonly used indicators of population health status.
142 II, 9. 1. 1| methodological shortcomings of many indicators, whether mortality or other
143 II, 9. 1. 1| Europe. The EURO-PERISTAT indicators, listed in Table 1, were
144 II, 9. 1. 1| existing perinatal health indicators using a DELPHI consensus
145 II, 9. 1. 1| Europe.~ ~The EURO-PERISTAT indicators are grouped into four themes:
146 II, 9. 1. 1| and health services. Core indicators are defined as those essential
147 II, 9. 1. 1| perinatal health, recommended indicators are those considered desirable
148 II, 9. 1. 1| across the member states, and indicators for further development
149 II, 9. 1. 1| 9.1.1.2.1. EURO-PERISTAT Indicators by category; Data on indicators
150 II, 9. 1. 1| Indicators by category; Data on indicators in bold italics are available
151 II, 9. 1. 1| medical intervention~ ~The indicators that were developed by EURO-PERISTAT
152 II, 9. 1. 1| presented here to show how these indicators, once they are part of a
153 II, 9. 1. 1| using currently reported indicators, are essential for monitoring
154 II, 9. 2. 2| information project Child Health Indicators of Life and Development (
155 II, 9. 2. 2| with identifying a range of indicators which would measure this
156 II, 9. 2. 2| A total of thirty eight indicators were recommended, of which
157 II, 9. 2. 2| years later few of these indicators have yet been built into
158 II, 9. 2. 2| of the recommended CHILD indicators, together with WHO Health
159 II, 9. 2. 2| relating to children. Thus 24 indicators are published as Table 6
160 II, 9. 2. 2| commonly agreed and tested indicators, which produce comparable
161 II, 9. 3. 1| boundaries change, and differing indicators may be used in various areas.
162 II, 9. 3. 1| commonly agreed and tested indicators which produce comparable
163 II, 9. 3. 2| well as two recommended indicators, maternal deaths by cause
164 II, 9. 3. 2| demographic and socioeconomic indicators that should be monitored,
165 II, 9. 3. 2| women. Of these proposed indicators, however, data are only
166 II, 9. 3. 2| project includes a series of indicators for monitoring healthcare
167 II, 9. 3. 2| identification of meaningful indicators that perform similarly across
168 II, 9. 3. 2| healthcare systems. Many indicators useful at national level
169 II, 9. 3. 2| in Europe.~ ~Few of the indicators recommended by EURO-PERISTAT
170 II, 9. 3. 2| international databases. These indicators nonetheless provide an indication
171 II, 9. 3. 2| of postpartum stay. These indicators were not selected for the
172 II, 9. 3. 2| 2006): Reproductive health indicators in the European Union: The
173 II, 9. 3. 3| Europe including five main indicators: sexual behaviour, teenage
174 II, 9. 3. 3| from the ECHI recommended indicators (htt European Countries
175 II, 9. 3. 3| HIV/AIDS and following defined indicators Some of them concern sexual
176 II, 9. 3. 3| defined in a guideline on core indicators ( ht ~ ~Majority of sexual
177 II, 9. 3. 3| the definition of some indicators differs country from country,
178 II, 9. 3. 3| recommends the following outcome indicators to monitor and evaluate
179 II, 9. 3. 3| broadening the number of indicators when surveys are carried
180 II, 9. 3. 3| systematic use of comparative indicators for sexual behaviour and
181 II, 9. 3. 3| comparative sexual health indicators will enable a more effective
182 II, 9. 3. 3| behaviour. However, most of the indicators are directly linked to outcomes
183 II, 9. 4. 5| systematic use of quality indicators for drug use and better
184 II, 9. 5. 2| Community Public Health Indicators). Euro-REVES was set up
185 II, 9. 5. 2| provide comparable health indicators that would address inequalities
186 II, 9. 5. 2| European populations. These indicators can simultaneously assess
187 II, 9. 5. 4| standardisation of existing indicators for health;~· Recognition
188 II, 9. 5. 4| social construction in gender indicators;~· To seek simple yet comprehensive
189 II, 9. 5. 4| commonly agreed and tested indicators which produce comparable
190 II, 9. 5. 6| Bonté J (2004): Health Indicators and Eurostat, UNECE/WHO~ ~
191 III, 10. 1 | Workplace~Physiological risk~indicators~ ~ ~Transport~ ~ ~ ~Social
192 III, 10. 2. 1| 1.2. Data sources~ ~Key indicators pertaining to smoking are
193 III, 10. 2. 1| along 5 key epidemiological indicators ((i) drug use among the
194 III, 10. 2. 1| but also other important indicators and data in the following
195 III, 10. 2. 1| set of key epidemiological indicators which need to be fully implemented
196 III, 10. 2. 1| European Global Oral Health Indicators Development Project~ ~ ~
197 III, 10. 2. 1| has also be used.~ ~The indicators identified for this document
198 III, 10. 2. 1| gingival~ ~A number of other indicators, as recommended in the EGOHID
199 III, 10. 2. 1| European Global Oral Health Indicators Development Project. 2003
200 III, 10. 2. 1| A selection of essential indicators in Europe recommended by
201 III, 10. 2. 1| European Global Oral Health Indicators Development Project. 2005
202 III, 10. 2. 1| and measurable goals and indicators. Surveillance of levels
203 III, 10. 2. 1| components which are relevant indicators of health.~ ~An important
204 III, 10. 2. 1| data on overall progress indicators – within the context of
205 III, 10. 2. 1| European Community Health Indicators– related to diet and physical activity
206 III, 10. 2. 1| Communities (2005a): Health status indicators from the national health
207 III, 10. 2. 1| Communities (2005b): Health status indicators from the national health
208 III, 10. 2. 1| Communities (2005c): Health status indicators from the national health
209 III, 10. 2. 1| Communities (2005d): Health status indicators from the national health
210 III, 10. 2. 1| Swedish children and health indicators – overweight, plasma homocysteine
211 III, 10. 2. 4| new approaches of health indicators based on genotyping as well
212 III, 10. 2. 4| later in the Chapter no indicators for the implementation of
213 III, 10. 2. 4| exist so far. Nevertheless, indicators and statistical material
214 III, 10. 2. 4| time. The future use of indicators and health statistics will
215 III, 10. 2. 4| in health care systems. Indicators and statistics can only
216 III, 10. 2. 4| well established health indicators for health reporting and
217 III, 10. 2. 4| traditional concepts of health indicators still apply. All health
218 III, 10. 2. 4| still apply. All health indicators, which have been developed
219 III, 10. 2. 4| new approaches of health indicators. The implementation of long
220 III, 10. 2. 4| develop such new health indicators. In addition to these large-scale
221 III, 10. 2. 4| development of such new indicators. ~ ~Thus, the main challenges
222 III, 10. 2. 4| new approaches of health indicators based on genotyping as well
223 III, 10. 2. 4| 2006). In the field of indicators, health statistics and surveillance,
224 III, 10. 2. 5| long list does not include indicators on foetal nutrition or early
225 III, 10. 3. 1| assessments methods and indicators it has been difficult to
226 III, 10. 3. 1| the basis of harmonised indicators (Lden and Lnight, where
227 III, 10. 3. 1| specified thresholds. The indicators to be used in noise mapping
228 III, 10. 3. 2| source: htt /.~Chemical indicators are under development by
229 III, 10. 3. 2| wild animals can serve as indicators of potential health effects
230 III, 10. 3. 2| Appropriate Environmental Indicators Related to Chemicals http d;
231 III, 10. 4. 1| information system based on indicators, proposed a list of air
232 III, 10. 4. 1| a list of air pollution indicators. Not fully developed yet,
233 III, 10. 4. 1| only partly based on these indicators and mainly on scientific
234 III, 10. 4. 3| assessment (draft). EEA - IMS Indicators - Bathing water quality (
235 III, 10. 4. 3| Statistics. Core health indicators. htt s2~WHO – Health Statistics;
236 III, 10. 4. 5| by the presence of faecal indicators and pathogens, poses limited
237 III, 10. 4. 5| standards of microbiological indicators for faecal contamination,
238 III, 10. 4. 5| assessment (draft). EEA - IMS Indicators - Bathing water quality (
239 III, 10. 5. 1| information.~htt ~ ~Urban health indicators~ ~Based on the awareness
240 III, 10. 5. 1| a system of urban health indicators.~ ht ~ ~UN-HABITAT~ ~The
241 III, 10. 5. 1| European Community Health Indicators~ECHIM~European Community
242 III, 10. 5. 1| European Community Health Indicators Monitoring~EEA~European
243 III, 10. 5. 2| indicate that for most health indicators (birth weight, bronchitis,
244 III, 10. 5. 2| Another survey on health care indicators in England identified rural
245 III, 10. 5. 2| of the available health indicators that would distinguish between
246 III, 10. 5. 2| population health and health care indicators in England. BMC Health Services
247 III, 10. 5. 3| and reliable data set and indicators on occupational diseases
248 III, 10. 5. 3| Kreis J, Boedeker W (2004a): Indicators for work-related health
249 III, 10. 6. 2| when necessary and develop indicators to establish how well the
250 IV, 11. 1. 1| system influences these indicators to various degrees, an examination
251 IV, 11. 1. 3| broad population health indicators.~ ~Nevertheless, the concept
252 IV, 11. 1. 3| country’s health system, these indicators are incredibly difficult
253 IV, 11. 1. 3| heavily on health status indicators to measure performance (
254 IV, 11. 1. 3| those based on disaggregated indicators such as infant mortality,
255 IV, 11. 1. 3| intended use of the performance indicators, more research is needed
256 IV, 11. 1. 5| medical specialty.~ ~Quality indicators are necessary to guide clinical
257 IV, 11. 1. 5| in developing appropriate indicators, few countries make use
258 IV, 11. 1. 5| further, developing quality indicators and reporting them to the
259 IV, 11. 1. 5| set of healthcare quality indicators that can be reliably reported
260 IV, 11. 1. 5| international expert group provided indicators for five priority areas,
261 IV, 11. 1. 5| primary care/prevention. Indicators included in the initial
262 IV, 11. 1. 5| et al, 2006). Among the indicators there were breast cancer
263 IV, 11. 1. 5| practice guidelines, quality indicators and information systems,
264 IV, 11. 1. 5| financially for meeting 146 indicators drawn from four domains (
265 IV, 11. 1. 5| documentation requirements. Quality indicators related to process seek
266 IV, 11. 1. 5| contract). Process-related indicators may also refer to a specified
267 IV, 11. 1. 5| comparing such subjective indicators of quality; indeed many
268 IV, 11. 1. 6| Health, 2005). The quality indicators that have been used include
269 IV, 11. 1. 6| infarction. These quality indicators are combined with more objective
270 IV, 11. 1. 6| combined with more objective indicators of output such as activity
271 IV, 11. 5. 6| higher measurable quality indicators than other replacement therapies.
272 IV, 11. 6. 4| it is necessary to define indicators, i.e. measures that can
273 IV, 11. 6. 4| period of time. Most health indicators are quantitative in nature
274 IV, 11. 6. 4| In some cases, outcome indicators could be expressed as measurements
275 IV, 11. 6. 4| Health Outcome Research and Indicators Collection (EUPHORIC) is
276 IV, 11. 6. 4| a common set of outcome indicators in a few clinically relevant
277 IV, 11. 6. 4| materials regarding validated indicators, nine disease areas (orthopaedics,
278 IV, 11. 6. 4| and a list of 54 outcome indicators adopted in European and
279 IV, 11. 6. 4| compute the selected outcome indicators, the type of data source
280 IV, 11. 6. 4| describe how to develop outcome indicators for arthroplasty, based
281 IV, 11. 6. 5| 2006): Health Care Quality Indicators Project: Initial Indicators
282 IV, 11. 6. 5| Indicators Project: Initial Indicators Report. Paris, OECD.~ ~Kelly
283 IV, 11. 6. 5| improvement using clinical indicators: the Danish National Indicator
284 IV, 12. 1 | European-wide common agreed indicators.~Communicable diseases~The
285 IV, 12. 2 | identify priorities, define indicators, produce guidelines and
286 IV, 12. 3 | common objectives and common indicators and have undertaken to report
287 IV, 12. 5 | information, with appropriate indicators; ensure appropriate coordination
288 IV, 12. 5 | Union based on all data and indicators and including a qualitative
289 IV, 12. 5 | take forward activities on indicators, data and diffusion in a
290 IV, 12. 5 | of priority areas (health indicators, health and environment,
291 IV, 12. 5 | list of European health indicators, including the “Healthy
292 IV, 12. 5 | European-wide common agreed indicators with regard to their definition,
293 IV, 12. 5 | European Community Health Indicators~ ~Several EU co-funded projects
294 IV, 12. 5 | European Community Health Indicators (ECHI) was defined, which
295 IV, 12. 5 | measures to implement these indicators in the EU-member states.~
296 IV, 12. 5 | classify the large number of indicators that have been developed
297 IV, 12. 5 | European Community Health Indicators (ECHI-Hierarchy) is as follows:~ ~
298 IV, 12. 5 | comprehensive overview of the ECHI indicators and other health indicators
299 IV, 12. 5 | indicators and other health indicators presented by the different
300 IV, 12. 5 | International Compendium of Health Indicators (ICHI, www ). The ongoing
301 IV, 12. 5 | rational and EU-wide system of indicators, the production and utilisation
302 IV, 12. 5 | Specifically Structural Indicators should cover all the EU
303 IV, 12. 5 | information needs, development of indicators, collection of data and
304 IV, 12. 5 | European Community Health Indicators (ECHI). Current activities
305 IV, 12. 5 | implementation of these indicators in the EU member states.
306 IV, 12. 5 | the Working Party Health Indicators) and the European Health
307 IV, 12. 5 | continue the work on specific indicators in order to complete the
308 IV, 12. 5 | European Community Health Indicators list that will serve Part
309 IV, 12. 5 | Working Parties on health indicators and data collection. Reports
310 IV, 12. 8 | terms of the basic health indicators, such as life expectancy
311 IV, 12. 10 | is a quantitative one. So indicators have been drawn up to follow
312 IV, 12. 10 | of general and synthetic indicators.~ ~The High Council of Public
313 IV, 12. 10 | Environment and Health Indicators;~- POPs in Human Milk;~-
314 IV, 12. 10 | the following: monitoring indicators, link to objective domain
315 IV, 12. 10 | determinants with monitoring indicators have a high priority.~ ~
316 IV, 12. 10 | behaviours~ ~Determinants~ ~Indicators~Domain of objective and
317 IV, 12. 10 | settings~ ~Determinants~ ~Indicators~Domain of objective and
318 IV, 12. 10 | determinants~ ~Determinants~Indicators~Domain of objective and
319 IV, 12. 10 | determinants~ ~Determinants~Indicators~Domain of objective and
320 IV, 12. 10 | determinants~ ~Determinants~Indicators~Domain of objective and
321 IV, 13. 1 | Differences in selected mortality indicators among EU Member States~ ~
322 IV, 13. 2. 2| European and local scale. EBD indicators show big differences between
323 IV, 13. 3 | higher risk.~ ~A number of indicators highlighted in this Report
324 IV, 13. 3 | all the above-mentioned indicators when health data concerning
325 IV, 13. 7. 2| analysis of 25 different indicators ranging from the percentage
326 IV, 13. 7. 2| the US in almost a dozen indicators. These include new science
327 IV, 13. 7. 2| of the five families of indicators can drag down the whole
328 IV, 13. 9 | editors) (2002): Child Health Indicators of Life and Development (
329 IV, 13. 9 | Mechtler R (2003): Child Health Indicators for Europe – A Priority
