Part, Chapter, Paragraph
1 I, 2. 2 | Member States – whilst the differences in travel habits open a
2 I, 2. 2 | that, without significant differences between old and new Member
3 I, 2. 4 | indicators of the wealth differences existing between countries
4 I, 2. 4 | clearly show that large differences existing among EU Member
5 I, 2. 4 | European countries, mortality differences between socio-economic groups
6 I, 2. 4 | example, a study looking at differences in mortality by level of
7 I, 2. 4 | to linguistic or cultural differences. Few have begun to address
8 I, 2. 4 | comprehensively by reducing social differences, preventing the ensuing
9 I, 2. 4 | preventing the ensuing health differences, or addressing the poor
10 I, 2. 5 | 3 shows the significant differences existing among unemployment
11 I, 2. 5 | this aspect. Traditional differences remain in the type of jobs
12 I, 2. 6 | promote health. Significant differences are shown among EU Member
13 I, 2. 7 | characteristics of the urban-rural differences, as in many countries there
14 II, 4. 1 | However, the significant differences in longevity observed across
15 II, 4. 1 | moreover, we will debate the differences between genders and the
16 II, 4. 1 | out that, due to cultural differences in reporting one’s own health,
17 II, 4. 1 | between genders. These gender differences may be a result of differential
18 II, 4. 1 | concept will minimise cultural differences in the comprehension of
19 II, 4. 2 | groups; there have been differences between men and women, and
20 II, 4. 2 | even though there are some differences among countries in the relative
21 II, 4. 2 | countries. There are remarkable differences across countries in the
22 II, 4. 2 | this may have to do with differences in the practice of coding
23 II, 4. 2 | countries. In spite of these differences across European countries,
24 II, 4. 2 | European countries is whether differences are likely to become smaller
25 II, 4. 3 | since 1995: similarities and differences between the 25 EU countries.
26 II, 5. 1. 1 | smoking are crucial to explain differences in IHD. Among all CVD risk
27 II, 5. 1. 1 | diabetes and smoking habit. Differences exist in the methodology
28 II, 5. 2. 2 | necessary to understand differences among countries in order
29 II, 5. 2. 2 | smoking are crucial to explain differences in IHD. Among all CVD risk
30 II, 5. 2. 2 | and smoking habit. Due to differences among countries in the methodology
31 II, 5. 2. 3 | discharges. There are great differences between hospitalization
32 II, 5. 2. 3 | in most countries but the differences narrow considerably above
33 II, 5. 2. 3 | highlighted substantial differences among countries.~ ~Table
34 II, 5. 2. 4 | Wellman J, 2004).~Due to differences in data collection methodology (
35 II, 5. 2. 4 | CVD can be attributed to differences in ‘classical risk factors’
36 II, 5. 2. 6 | consideration the pharmacological differences among these compounds and
37 II, 5. 3. 2 | surveillance system to describe differences, identity problems and promote
38 II, 5. 3. 2 | set to measure and explain differences in cancer survival rates
39 II, 5. 3. 2 | so as to interpret these differences. The four phases of the
40 II, 5. 3. 6 | survival trends and country differences in survival. The EUROCARE-3
41 II, 5. 3. 6 | programmes. This suggests differences in the availability of effective
42 II, 5. 3. 6 | decreases in geographic differences over time, which are mainly
43 II, 5. 3. 6 | account for most of the differences noticed in outcomes.~ ~
44 II, 5. 3. 7 | practice~ ~International differences and trends in cancer survival
45 II, 5. 3. 7 | consistent with geographical differences or trends in the type of
46 II, 5. 3. 7 | that international survival differences are at least partly attributable
47 II, 5. 3. 7 | of intervention, such as differences in stage at diagnosis, access
48 II, 5. 3. 7 | Europe:~· There are wide differences in the teaching of oncology (
49 II, 5. 3. 7 | given to individuals. These differences require research to identify
50 II, 5. 4. 1 | 3 years. Very important differences in prevalence are observed
51 II, 5. 4. 1 | involved in the process.~Differences in the possibility to ensure
52 II, 5. 4. 1 | economic, geographic and ethnic differences. (Smith, 2007; Dyhr, 2007;
53 II, 5. 4. 2 | and imprecise estimates. Differences between different national
54 II, 5. 5.Int(12)| Hallstrom, T. (2001) Gender differences in mental health. In P.
55 II, 5. 5. 1 | vary, but also because of differences in organising mental health
56 II, 5. 5. 1 | beginning of the 2000s. National differences are possible due to differences
57 II, 5. 5. 1 | differences are possible due to differences in ICD interpretation regardless
58 II, 5. 5. 1 | to care is influenced by differences between countries in the
59 II, 5. 5. 1 | WHO EURO databases due to differences in presenting the data.~ ~
60 II, 5. 5. 1 | developments~ ~In spite of the differences and the increasing activity
61 II, 5. 5. 1 | 2000 Investigators (2007). Differences in lifetime use of services
62 II, 5. 5. 2 | by each study, there are differences in the resulting prevalence
63 II, 5. 5. 2 | dementia.~ ~There may be differences in the distribution of different
64 II, 5. 5. 3 | Adolescents show gender differences in dissatisfaction with
65 II, 5. 5. 3 | not take into account the differences in the national healthcare
66 II, 5. 5. 3 | be the consequence of the differences between European mental
67 II, 5. 5. 3 | country or cultural specific differences in prevalence and in certain
68 II, 5. 5. 3 | further evaluate regional differences, we looked for the absolute
69 II, 5. 5. 3 | this cannot only be due to differences in psychiatric care, actually
70 II, 5. 5. 3 | likely that they express differences in the cause of deaths assignment.~
71 II, 5. 5. 3 | would be no considerable differences. This points to the necessity
72 II, 5. 5. 3 | might in part be due to differences in the mental health care
73 II, 5. 5. 3 | extent of variation is due to differences in the national health information
74 II, 5. 5. 3 | is difficult because of differences between the specific circumstances
75 II, 5. 5. 3 | practice also shows significant differences across European countries.
76 II, 5. 5. 3 | Fricke and Pirck, 2004). Differences in usage of second generation
77 II, 5. 5. 3 | Organization (WHO) (1997): Gender differences in the epidemiology of affective
78 II, 5. 5. 3 | agreement on case definition and differences in case finding methods
79 II, 5. 5. 3 | and do not explain major differences in reported prevalence over
80 II, 5. 5. 3 | fully explain the major differences in reported prevalence over
81 II, 5. 5. 3 | Forsgren et al, 2005). The differences are mostly explained by
82 II, 5. 5. 3 | et al, 1990). Some of the differences between the Icelandic and
83 II, 5. 5. 3 | despite methodological differences, the north-to-south latitudinal
84 II, 5. 5. 3 | 97.~In Finland, regional differences in MS prevalence and incidence
85 II, 5. 5. 3 | studies showed that regional differences applied to prevalence but
86 II, 5. 5. 3 | biological factors, i.e., differences in environmental exposures,
87 II, 5. 5. 3 | susceptibility underlying such differences cannot be ruled out. Mean
88 II, 5. 5. 3 | relevant factor underlying the differences in MS distribution.~A general
89 II, 5. 5. 3 | adjusting for price level differences in different sectors between
90 II, 5. 5. 3 | disease or to demographic differences but to pre-morbid personality,
91 II, 5. 5. 3 | Finland: incidence trends and differences in relapsing remitting and
92 II, 5. 5. 3 | may be the consequence of differences in methodology, population
93 II, 5. 5. 3 | potential source of variation is differences in diagnostic criteria.It
94 II, 5. 5. 3 | community-based studies. Differences in methods for case ascertainment
95 II, 5. 5. 3 | for prevalence studies, differences in methodology have a considerable
96 II, 5. 5. 3 | al, 2003). Methodological differences account for the different
97 II, 5. 5. 3 | in their results due to differences in methodology.~Our estimates
98 II, 5. 5. 3 | practice. Although there are differences when addressing specific
99 II, 5. 6. 3 | countries. However, major differences in the epidemiology of risk
100 II, 5. 6. 3 | understand whether there are real differences between countries. Point
101 II, 5. 6. 6 | general population: studies of differences in age, gender, social class,
102 II, 5. 7. 3 | Although there are considerable differences in absolute incidence rates
103 II, 5. 7. 3 | Europe there are considerable differences in patient survival (van
104 II, 5. 7. 3 | Although there are considerable differences in absolute incidence rates
105 II, 5. 7. 4 | Apart from international differences in the incidence rates of
106 II, 5. 7. 4 | RRT for diabetic ESRD and differences in stages of economic development
107 II, 5. 7. 4 | causes for the considerable differences in the overall incidence
108 II, 5. 8. 3 | smokers, with no significant differences between men and women.~ ~
109 II, 5. 8. 4 | smokers, with no significant differences between men and women. The
110 II, 5. 8. 4 | and 1996 gender-related differences decreased, and COPD spread
111 II, 5. 8. 4 | data, probably because of differences in the methods used for
112 II, 5. 8. 7 | Saetta M, Papi A (2003): Differences in airway inflammation in
113 II, 5. 9. FB | bottle-fed ones, but no differences between the two groups were
114 II, 5. 9. 3 | that there are considerable differences among European countries.~ ~
115 II, 5. 9. 4 | whole sample was 9%, without differences between age groups. Farm
116 II, 5. 9. 4 | the role of qualitative differences in particulate air pollution
117 II, 5. 9. 4 | coarse PM. No significant differences were observed between locations
118 II, 5. 9. 4 | coarse PM fractions. However, differences in the content of these
119 II, 5. 10. 2 | information on sex and gender differences has been collected, although
120 II, 5. 10. 3 | limited due to significant differences in potential of exposure,
121 II, 5. 11. 3 | than white children, no differences in prevalence rates were
122 II, 5. 11. 3 | significant. The significant differences in prevalence between females
123 II, 5. 13 | physical activity. There are distinct differences in the Northern and Southern (
124 II, 5. 13 | though the dimension of these differences can vary between men and
125 II, 5. 14. 3 | 65-74 present significant differences for what concerns the rate
126 II, 5. 14. 3 | in Netherlands). These differences are related to sanitary
127 II, 5. 14. 3 | and 2000, with variable differences according to the country (Wid m
128 II, 6. 2 | improved. There are huge differences of accuracy, and hence usefulness,
129 II, 6. 3. 1 | mention inherent socioeconomic differences. Whilst the main responsibility
130 II, 6. 3. 2 | there may be big regional differences within countries, which
131 II, 6. 3. 2 | Additionally, there are marked differences in the type of antibiotics
132 II, 6. 3. 2 | sometimes disguising regional differences within countries. Ideally,
133 II, 6. 3. 3 | countries are also inhibited by differences in data collection. Screening
134 II, 6. 3. 6 | for many diseases, large differences between surveillance systems
135 II, 6. 3. 6 | countries are complicated due to differences in the surveillance systems.~ ~
136 II, 7. 1 | 2007). There are large differences in the occurrence of injuries
137 II, 7. 3. 3 | Austria, which reflects differences in national hospital admission
138 II, 7. 3. 4 | between Member States due to differences in national definitions
139 II, 7. 3. 5 | the 1-4 age group. Again, differences between countries in the
140 II, 8. 1. 1 | from disability. Functional differences are measured along three
141 II, 8. 1. 3 | to be involved in work.~Differences among countries vary widely,
142 II, 8. 1. 3 | data may be affected by differences in self-perception of the
143 II, 8. 1. 3 | with no restrictions. These differences are also reflected in the
144 II, 8. 1. 3 | provided and needed~ ~Broad differences exist in the provision of
145 II, 8. 1. 3 | genders) with no limitations. Differences in earnings reflect differences
146 II, 8. 1. 3 | Differences in earnings reflect differences in educational and occupational
147 II, 9 | most recent year~ ~Fi ~ ~Differences between the new and old
148 II, 9 | the study of socioeconomic differences emphasizes the importance
149 II, 9 | decreases with age, though great differences exist between countries
150 II, 9. 1. 1 | have improved, absolute differences in mortality rates between
151 II, 9. 1. 1 | Latvia and Romania. There are differences in rates of neonatal mortality
152 II, 9. 1. 1 | trends and understand the differences observed between countries,
153 II, 9. 1. 1 | and consequences of these differences.~ ~It is increasingly understood
154 II, 9. 1. 1 | Luton D, Blot P (2002): Differences in management and results
155 II, 9. 1. 1 | RS (1989): Socioeconomic differences in rates of cesarean section.
156 II, 9. 1. 2 | type of congenital anomaly. Differences between countries in infant
157 II, 9. 1. 2 | policies and practices, differences in uptake of screening and
158 II, 9. 1. 2 | organisational factors, and differences in TOPFA laws, influence
159 II, 9. 1. 2 | 5% (Table 9.1.2.3). The differences in total mortality (TOPFA
160 II, 9. 1. 2 | but is also influenced by differences between countries in the
161 II, 9. 1. 2 | prevalence corresponds to differences in maternal age profile
162 II, 9. 1. 2 | maternal age. In 2000-2004, differences in policy and practice regarding
163 II, 9. 1. 2 | as well as maternal age differences, resulted in an over four-fold
164 II, 9. 1. 2 | most apparent geographic differences are represented by the lower
165 II, 9. 1. 2 | in new members States~ ~Differences between the new and old
166 II, 9. 1. 2 | the study of socioeconomic differences emphasizes the importance
167 II, 9. 1. 2 | available about socioeconomic differences in congenital anomaly risk
168 II, 9. 1. 2 | may result from cultural differences underlying policy or individual
169 II, 9. 1. 2 | implementation of screening, or from differences in organization, resources
170 II, 9. 2. 2 | food availability. Distinct differences are seen between the Northern
171 II, 9. 2. 3(2) | episodes, and the considerable differences in diagnostic labelling
172 II, 9. 3. 1 | equally.~ ~The key biological differences have been identified between
173 II, 9. 3. 1 | pain.~ ~The above listed differences can only partially account
174 II, 9. 3. 1 | Neither can these biological differences explain the large country
175 II, 9. 3. 1 | are clear and consistent differences in the patterns of mental
176 II, 9. 3. 1 | revascularization. Reasons for gender differences are thought to include greater
177 II, 9. 3. 1 | are striking inter-country differences among men: in Europe, per
178 II, 9. 3. 1 | is reason to believe that differences in coding practices may
179 II, 9. 3. 1 | may explain some of the differences observed in reported rates
180 II, 9. 3. 1 | osteoporosis. There are substantial differences in the descriptive epidemiology
181 II, 9. 3. 2 | births, whilst observed differences are not statistically significant.~ ~
182 II, 9. 3. 2 | babies - and understand the differences observed between countries,
183 II, 9. 3. 2 | is illustrative of wide differences in the European approaches
184 II, 9. 3. 2 | services explain the large differences between EU Member States.~ ~
185 II, 9. 3. 2 | Luton D, Blot P (2002): Differences in management and results
186 II, 9. 3. 2 | RS (1989): Socioeconomic differences in rates of cesarean section.
187 II, 9. 3. 3 | et al, 2004). The gender differences are wide. Among boys, positive
188 II, 9. 3. 3 | supports the evidence that differences in attitudes and behaviour
189 II, 9. 3. 3 | al, 2004). Cross-national differences undoubtedly reflect fundamental
190 II, 9. 3. 3 | religious and educational differences across countries, as well
191 II, 9. 3. 3 | across countries, as well as differences in public policy. The most
192 II, 9. 4. 2 | diseases and the socioeconomic differences in their prevalence. Large
193 II, 9. 4. 2 | addition, there are cultural differences which may influence the
194 II, 9. 4. 3 | women and men show marked differences. Women’s longevity makes
195 II, 9. 4. 3 | what extent the incidence differences reflect true variation in
196 II, 9. 4. 3 | socio-economic group, or differences in access to screening (
197 II, 9. 4. 3 | aged individuals. Gender differences have been highlighted, with
198 II, 9. 4. 4 | decreases with age, though great differences exist between countries
199 II, 9. 4. 5 | will be influenced by these differences in education level, and
200 II, 9. 5. 1 | biological and physiological differences between men and women, “
201 II, 9. 5. 1 | changes in a given context.~ ~Differences in prevalence / incidence,
202 II, 9. 5. 1 | vary between the genders. Differences in health behaviour (e.g.
203 II, 9. 5. 1 | components contributing to gender differences in health and longevity.
204 II, 9. 5. 1 | responsible for the observed differences in longevity, health and
205 II, 9. 5. 1 | associated not only to biological differences between men and women and
206 II, 9. 5. 1 | in men seem to be due to differences in gender norms about risk-taking
207 II, 9. 5. 1 | protection. The described gender differences contribute to inequalities
208 II, 9. 5. 1 | a lack of data on gender differences in health and changing gender
209 II, 9. 5. 1 | 2004).~ ~The significant differences in the way men and women
210 II, 9. 5. 2 | understanding of gender differences in the use of health and
211 II, 9. 5. 3 | 1998).~ ~Table 9.5.1. Sex differences in the prevalence of mental
212 II, 9. 5. 3 | Suicide Rates~ ~Gender differences are apparent in the patterns
213 II, 9. 5. 3 | symptoms. There may also be differences in access to specific treatments
214 II, 9. 5. 3 | are some important gender differences in smoking behaviour. About
215 II, 9. 5. 3 | physical activity. There are distinct differences in the northern and southern (
216 II, 9. 5. 3 | though the dimension of these differences can vary between men and
217 II, 9. 5. 3 | Foundation, 2006).~ ~Gender differences have been observed in care
218 II, 9. 5. 4 | explanations for the existing differences;~· To ensure these methods
219 II, 9. 5. 6 | Walter V (2004): Gender differences in health: a Canadian study
220 II, 9. 5. 6 | Hällström T (2001): ‘Gender differences in mental health’, in Gender
221 III, 10. 2. 1 | apparent, although regional differences do occur. There are countries
222 III, 10. 2. 1 | past decades show that the differences in smoking prevalence for
223 III, 10. 2. 1 | apply to younger men. The differences found reflect the tobacco
224 III, 10. 2. 1 | to societal and cultural differences, it would be impossible
225 III, 10. 2. 1 | to societal and cultural differences (European Comission, 2008).~ ~
226 III, 10. 2. 1 | Grötvedt L (2000): Educational differences in smoking: international
227 III, 10. 2. 1 | Despite the present differences between countries, the recorded
228 III, 10. 2. 1 | markers, possibly due to differences in vaccination levels.~ ~
229 III, 10. 2. 1 | results show significant differences, with rates varying from
230 III, 10. 2. 1 | varied around 60-70%. These differences may be related to environmental
231 III, 10. 2. 1 | one study to another. Such differences are probably more a matter
232 III, 10. 2. 1 | methodology than of real differences in the disease itself. At
233 III, 10. 2. 1 | are applied to adjust for differences in the methods used such
234 III, 10. 2. 1 | Moreover, socioeconomic differences in the validity of self-reports
235 III, 10. 2. 1 | step 2 and 3, important differences play a role. For example
236 III, 10. 2. 1 | Z (2004): Interregional differences in health in Slovenia, I:
237 III, 10. 2. 4 | multiple genomic and protein differences among malignancies such
238 III, 10. 3. 1 | weighted in accordance with differences in hearing sensitivity at
239 III, 10. 3. 1 | measures have to consider differences in exposure for different
240 III, 10. 3. 1 | non-harmonised way. Due to differences in methodologies as assessments
241 III, 10. 3. 1 | but there are regional differences due to the presence of radon.
242 III, 10. 3. 1 | traffic). However, due to differences in the measurement of annoyance
243 III, 10. 3. 1 | countries are mainly hampered by differences in the availability of input
244 III, 10. 3. 1 | annoyance rates are hampered by differences in the measurement and definition
245 III, 10. 3. 2 | countries and indicated major differences between countries from lipid-based
246 III, 10. 4. 2 | knowledge and research needs. Differences in risk assessments and
247 III, 10. 4. 3 | cautiously, as between-country differences are likely to reflect the
248 III, 10. 4. 3 | reporting systems rather then differences in outbreaks; moreover,
249 III, 10. 4. 5 | but there are significant differences between countries – from
250 III, 10. 4. 5 | However, there are large differences between individual countries,
251 III, 10. 4. 5 | Figure 10.4.5.2.3). The large differences in generation statistics
252 III, 10. 5. 2 | looking into urban-rural differences, a key challenge is always
253 III, 10. 5. 2 | the existing quantitative differences (Eurofound, 2006). In the
254 III, 10. 5. 2 | in poorer countries the differences between urban and rural
255 III, 10. 5. 2 | evidence on educational differences, with rural residents being
256 III, 10. 5. 2 | conflicting evidence on the health differences between urban and rural settings.
257 III, 10. 5. 2 | is available on mortality differences and life expectancy in urban
258 III, 10. 5. 2 | there are striking gender differences for individual countries.
259 III, 10. 5. 2 | than in most rural areas. Differences in death rates between rural
260 III, 10. 5. 2 | mortality and morbidity differences implies to consider the
261 III, 10. 5. 2 | consider the demographic differences as well, i.e. account all
262 III, 10. 5. 2 | statements on the urban and rural differences of health status are only
263 III, 10. 5. 2 | quickly changing and that differences in urban places may become
264 III, 10. 5. 2 | may reduce the existing differences described above. Most of
265 III, 10. 5. 2 | dimension of urban-rural differences in population health. Therefore,
266 III, 10. 5. 2 | Life Survey: Urban-rural differences. Luxembourg.~ ~Eurostat (
267 III, 10. 5. 2 | health care utilization differences. Presentation held by Jouke
268 III, 10. 5. 2 | Urban-rural mental health differences in Great Britain: findings
269 III, 10. 5. 3(44)| that the observed country differences may reflect cultural awareness
270 III, 10. 5. 3 | this issue. Traditional differences remain in the types of jobs
271 III, 10. 6. 2 | European countries mortality differences between socio-economic groups
272 III, 10. 6. 2 | a study looking at the differences in mortality per level of
273 III, 10. 6. 2 | to linguistic or cultural differences. Few have begun to address
274 III, 10. 6. 2 | comprehensively by reducing social differences, preventing the ensuing
275 III, 10. 6. 2 | preventing the ensuing health differences or addressing the poor health
276 III, 10. 6. 2 | health that results from the differences above. This would ensure
277 III, 10. 6. 2 | JP (2005): Socio-economic differences in the prevalence of common
278 IV, 11. 1. 2 | reliability, though definitional differences do exist across countries
279 IV, 11. 1. 3 | chapter, there are important differences between each system, even
280 IV, 11. 1. 4 | after standardizing for need differences has been compared across
281 IV, 11. 1. 5 | 2000). Moreover, due to differences in the way quality is measured
282 IV, 11. 1. 5 | are useful for comparing differences in opinions across countries
283 IV, 11. 1. 5 | subjective, while cross-country differences may reflect, among other
284 IV, 11. 1. 5 | reflect, among other things, differences in expectations, economic
285 IV, 11. 1. 5 | European region, cultural differences may be driving a large part
286 IV, 11. 1. 6 | are needed to account for differences in hospital structure, region
287 IV, 11. 1. 6 | slowly, but there were no differences for patients. In Belgium
288 IV, 11. 3. 1 | differ across Europe. These differences range from the type of training
289 IV, 11. 3. 1 | advance to the next level. Differences in training are gradually
290 IV, 11. 5. 4 | donors. There are also large differences between Member States’ successes
291 IV, 11. 5. 4 | see Figure 11.10). These differences cannot be easily explained.
292 IV, 11. 5. 4 | 6% to 42%. Again, these differences are not easy to understand.
293 IV, 11. 5. 4 | there are considerable differences in organ donation and transplantation
294 IV, 11. 5. 4 | address. This leads to huge differences between Member States in
295 IV, 11. 5. 5 | Within the EU there are huge differences in access that cannot merely
296 IV, 11. 5. 5 | cannot merely be explained by differences in donation rates. Accessibility
297 IV, 11. 6. 1 | countries, owing partly to differences in methods and accuracy
298 IV, 11. 6. 4 | There are also significant differences in the level of resources
299 IV, 11. 6. 4 | the severity of cases and differences in clinical practice among
300 IV, 12. 2 | detectable yet~ ~International differences and trends in cancer survival
301 IV, 12. 2 | consistent with geographical differences or trends in the type of
302 IV, 12. 2 | that international survival differences are at least partly attributable
303 IV, 12. 2 | to intervention, such as differences in stage at diagnosis, access
304 IV, 12. 3 | discrimination, property and differences among European regions.
305 IV, 12. 5 | those related to gender differences, in order to contribute
306 IV, 12. 5 | the genders. These gender differences may be a result of differential
307 IV, 12. 10 | Besides focusing on sex differences and specificities, health
308 IV, 13. 1 | 13.1. Differences in selected mortality indicators
309 IV, 13. 1 | clearly show major health differences occurring among different
310 IV, 13. 1 | data see Table 13.3). Large differences have also been reported
311 IV, 13. 1 | 27~ ~These considerable differences clearly indicate that considerable
312 IV, 13. 1 | reached by comparing the large differences among population groups
313 IV, 13. 2. 2 | EBD indicators show big differences between people living in
314 IV, 13. 3 | particularly from the large differences emerging for all the above-mentioned
315 IV, 13. 5 | universal access. While some differences in provision are inevitable,
316 IV, 13. 5 | main cause for significant differences in life expectancy observed
317 IV, 13. 5 | to linguistic or cultural differences. However, only a few countries
318 IV, 13. 5 | comprehensively by reducing social differences, preventing the ensuing
319 IV, 13. 5 | preventing the ensuing health differences or addressing the resulting
320 IV, 13. 7. 2 | still significant national differences between innovation leaders,
321 IV, 13. 7. 4 | reasons often depending on differences in cultural, religion and
322 IV, 13. 7. 5 | health monitoring, and of differences between the different national
