| | 
Part, Chapter, Paragraph
1 I, 3. 1 | Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Italy,
2 I, 3. 1 | 00) and 1993 (1.51). In Germany fertility also dropped by
3 I, 3. 2 | early 1970s, in Austria and Germany in the late 1970s and early
4 I, 3. 2 | of 4-10% is foreseen for Germany, Greece, Italy, Portugal
5 I, 3. 2 | statistics, within the EU25, Germany stands out with over 7 million
6 I, 3. 3 | value (28.9), followed by Germany (26.8), Sweden (26.4) and
7 I, 3. 3 | observation period (2000-2004) is Germany. Whereas the annual growth
8 I, 3. 3 | Italy, Denmark, Luxembourg, Germany, and the Netherlands, while
9 I, 3. 3 | Slovenia, Poland, Finland, Germany and Croatia. Small shares
10 I, 3. 3 | reported in Turkey, Cyprus, Germany, Slovakia and Spain.~ ~The
11 I, 3. 3 | Italy, Croatia, Bulgaria and Germany have the highest.~ ~Finally,
12 I, 3. 3 | largest changes are in Italy, Germany, Spain, Austria, and Slovenia.
13 I, 3. 3 | Italy, France, the UK and Germany are currently the ‘most
14 II, 4. 1 | Austria, Belgium, Finland, Germany and Italy appeared to experience
15 II, 4. 1 | compression of disability whilst Germany, Ireland, the Netherlands
16 II, 5. 2. 2 | Slovakia and former GDR-Eastern Germany) and Balkan Eastern European
17 II, 5. 2. 2 | European countries (Belgium, Germany, Luxembourg, The Netherlands,
18 II, 5. 2. 3(5) | countries include: Belgium, Germany, Luxembourg, Netherlands,
19 II, 5. 3. 2 | down as in the former West Germany (1991), in the former East
20 II, 5. 3. 2 | 1991), in the former East Germany (1991), in Hungary (1992);
21 II, 5. 3. 3 | Austria, Belgium, France, Germany, Luxembourg, the Netherlands,
22 II, 5. 3. 6 | estimated for five regions (West Germany, the United Kingdom, Eastern
23 II, 5. 3. 6 | Norway), Austria, France, Germany, the Netherlands, Italy,
24 II, 5. 3. 6 | European countries (France, Germany, Italy, Switzerland, the
25 II, 5. 3. 6 | another . Austria, France, Germany and Iceland had the highest
26 II, 5. 3. 7 | CZECH REPUBLIC~Yes (2003)~DENMARK~Yes~GERMANY~No~ESTONIA~Yes~IRELAND~Yes (
27 II, 5. 4. 1 | 8 million, USA, Russia, Germany, Japan, Pakistan, Brazil,
28 II, 5. 4. 1 | different EU Member States. Germany and Austria have the largest
29 II, 5. 4. 1 | countries: Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands,
30 II, 5. 4. 2 | 1000 (UK) and 118/1000 (Germany), and a median of 87.5/1000.
31 II, 5. 4. 2 | from 2% (Turkey) to 15% (Germany) amongst the four countries
32 II, 5. 4. 2 | months. The median is 95% for Germany. This clinical parameter
33 II, 5. 4. 3 | from 2% (Turkey) to 15% (Germany) amongst the four countries
34 II, 5. 4. 3 | in fact, in EUCID only Germany provided a figure of 52%.~
35 II, 5. 4. 3 | between 37 (Cyprus) and 2,675 (Germany), with a median of 669 per
36 II, 5. 4. 6 | with no plan, six, namely Germany, Bulgaria, Estonia, Hungary,
37 II, 5. 5. 1 | million from Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands,
38 II, 5. 5. 1 | between countries, taking Germany as the reference. Three
39 II, 5. 5. 1 | than the reference country Germany: the Nordic countries and
40 II, 5. 5. 1 | to the reference country Germany: France, Belgium, Luxemburg,
41 II, 5. 5. 1 | than the reference country Germany : Most Mediterranean countries (
42 II, 5. 5. 2 | covered in the study were Germany, France, Italy, the Netherlands,
43 II, 5. 5. 2 | was the case for Austria, Germany, Hungary, Ireland, Luxembourg,
44 II, 5. 5. 2 | countries (e.g. Luxembourg and Germany), there is a separate obligatory
45 II, 5. 5. 2 | into force and so far, only Germany and Scotland (as part of
46 II, 5. 5. 2 | has already been seen in Germany and Luxembourg with the
47 II, 5. 5. 3 | Czech Republic, Estonia, France, Germany, Greenland, Lithuania, Russia,
48 II, 5. 5. 3 | Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Italy, Liechtenstein,
49 II, 5. 5. 3 | Finland~ ~X~ ~France~ ~X~ ~Germany~ ~X~There are no representative
50 II, 5. 5. 3 | Austria, Belgium, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Italy,
51 II, 5. 5. 3 | Sweden, United Kingdom, Germany, Norway and Denmark). Thus,
52 II, 5. 5. 3 | countries like France and Germany are classified according
53 II, 5. 5. 3 | Prescription data from Germany from the 12-months period
54 II, 5. 5. 3 | per head of population; Germany displaying the next highest
55 II, 5. 5. 3 | 34% in Hungary, 26% in Germany, 23% in France, 16% in Czech Republic,
56 II, 5. 5. 3 | such as Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, The Netherlands,
57 II, 5. 5. 3 | programmes to fight stigma. In Germany, the German Society of Psychiatry,
58 II, 5. 5. 3 | Open the Doors” as did Germany; also Slovakia has a programme
59 II, 5. 5. 3 | schizophrenia research e.g. in Germany. Establishing research alliances
60 II, 5. 5. 3 | programmes is necessary. In Germany this issue is one of the
61 II, 5. 5. 3 | Diagnosis in Denmark and Germany. Psychopathology 35:36-47~
62 II, 5. 5. 3 | European countries (Italy, Germany, Holland, UK, Portugal,
63 II, 5. 5. 3 | seizures in previous 3 years~Germany I 12 months Single seizures
64 II, 5. 5. 3 | their social situation in Germany. To date, standardised data
65 II, 5. 5. 3 | countries.~The MS prevalence in Germany has been rather homogeneously
66 II, 5. 5. 3 | Netherlands, Switzerland, Germany, Austria and Portugal (Pugliatti
67 II, 5. 5. 3 | The MSTCG from Austria, Germany and Switzerland developed
68 II, 5. 5. 3 | 2005): [MS registry in Germany—design and first results
69 II, 5. 5. 3 | al (2007): MS Register in Germany – results of the extension
70 II, 5. 5. 3 | multiple sclerosis patients in germany]. Nervenartz 71:288-294.~
71 II, 5. 5. 3 | sclerosis in South Lower Saxony, Germany. Neuroepidemiology 8:207-
72 II, 5. 5. 3 | institutionalised patients in Germany (Evers and Obladen, 1994).
73 II, 5. 5. 3 | for Parkinson’s disease in Germany. Pharmacoeconomics 23(8):
74 II, 5. 7. 2 | their whole country (France, Germany, Italy, Spain and Portugal).
75 II, 5. 7. 2 | EU-15 Member States (France, Germany, Italy, Portugal, Spain
76 II, 5. 7. 3 | Hallan et al, 2006) to 7.2% (Germany) (Meisinger et al, 2006)
77 II, 5. 7. 3 | similar in males and females (Germany, Italy) or higher in females (
78 II, 5. 7. 3 | to 1057 patients pmp in Germany (Tables 5.7.6 A and B).
79 II, 5. 9. FB | hay fever in former East Germany only 6 to 8 years after
80 II, 5. 9. FB | only 6 to 8 years after the Germany reunification. It has been
81 II, 5. 9. 3 | Kingdom, Netherlands and Germany). The epidemiological results
82 II, 5. 9. 3 | Greece (5.6%), Poland (5.4%), Germany (2.5%), Hungary (4%), Macedonia (
83 II, 5. 9. 3 | 10.6% and Poland 8.5% and Germany 3%. These results show that
84 II, 5. 9. 3 | asthma prevalence (East Germany, Australia).~ ~Table 5.9.
85 II, 5. 9. 4 | Paris~–~–~ ~–~Low~–~–~–~–~Germany~ Erfurt~Low~Low~ND~–~–~High~
86 II, 5. 9. 7 | Epidemiology, Neuherberg, Germany~ ~Holgate ST, Price D, Valovirta
87 II, 5. 11. 3 | Decrease in nickel allergy in Germany and regulatory interventions,
88 II, 5. 11. 3 | high as 6% in France and Germany (Fouere et al, 2005). The
89 II, 5. 12. 3 | were smaller in Austria, Germany and the Czech Republic,
90 II, 5. 13 | obesity ranges between US$ 17 (Germany, 2001) and US$ 202 (France,
91 II, 5. 14. 2 | questionnaire schemes. In France, Germany, Spain, a series of surveys
92 II, 5. 14. 3 | health care expenditures. Germany spent proportionally the
93 II, 6. 3. 3 | Czech Republic, Denmark, Germany, Greece, Hungary, the Netherlands,
94 II, 6. 3. 4 | Five countries (France, Germany, Poland, Spain and United
95 II, 6. 3. 5 | coverage is not uniform, with Germany reporting almost three quarters
96 II, 6. 3. 5 | been observed in France, Germany and Italy. The incidence
97 II, 6. 3. 5 | 50% of cases (776) from Germany. The overall incidence in
98 II, 6. 3. 5 | reported by Ireland (2.26) and Germany (0.94). Elimination has
99 II, 6. 3. 6 | outbreak of shigellosis in Germany was described linking the
100 II, 6. 3. 6 | These were reported by Germany (56 cases), France (37 cases)
101 II, 6. 3. 7 | also noticed in France, Germany, Belgium, Austria, and Luxembourg.~ ~
102 II, 6. 3. 7 | reported by 21 countries. Germany and France reported the
103 II, 6. 3. 7 | countries; four of them from Germany and one from the UK. There
104 II, 6. 3. 7 | uncommon, and in recent years Germany has reported annually some
105 II, 6. 3. 7 | Leone, and two cases in Germany in 2000 from Ghana or Côte
106 II, 6. 3. 7 | one case was reported by Germany in 1999 (imported from Côte
107 II, 7. 2. 6 | Cyprus, Denmark, France, Germany (regional), Italy, Latvia,
108 II, 8. 1. 2 | EU15 countries apart from Germany, the Netherlands and the
109 II, 9 | drugs also brings Estonia, Germany, and the United Kingdom
110 II, 9 | the same age. Belgium and Germany are characterised by a comparatively
111 II, 9 | and lowest in Finland, Germany, Sweden and the United Kingdom.
112 II, 9. 1. 1 | countries, including Austria, Germany and Portugal, add a minimum
113 II, 9. 1. 2 | countries participating from 3% (Germany) to 100% (Norway, Sweden,
114 II, 9. 1. 2 | England & Wales, France, Germany). Others have an upper gestational
115 II, 9. 1. 2 | higher rates, for example Germany, the Netherlands and Denmark
116 II, 9. 2. 3 | both Flemish and French), Germany and Slovenia thinking they
117 II, 9. 2. 4 | drugs also brings Estonia, Germany, and the United Kingdom
118 II, 9. 2. 4 | the same age. Belgium and Germany are characterised by a comparatively
119 II, 9. 2. 4 | and lowest in Finland, Germany, Sweden and the United Kingdom.
120 II, 9. 3. 1 | adults aged 20 or over. In Germany the prevalence of people
121 II, 9. 3. 1 | marginal increase in Austria, Germany, Hungary, Malta and the
122 II, 9. 3. 1 | Kingdom) or increasing (Germany and France). Some sources,
123 II, 9. 3. 2 | largest old EU Member States (Germany, France and United Kingdom).
124 II, 9. 3. 3 | England, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Italy, Norway,
125 II, 9. 3. 3 | carried out recently in Germany (Hessling, 2006), Italy (
126 II, 9. 3. 3 | have been carried out in Germany (results from 1980 are based
127 II, 9. 3. 3 | based on data from West Germany only, all studies since
128 II, 9. 3. 3 | since 1994 include East Germany) and present detailed information
129 II, 9. 3. 3 | intercourse (England, Finland, Germany, Scotland, Sweden, Wales);
130 II, 9. 3. 3 | Austria, Denmark, France, Germany, Great Britain, Italy, the
131 II, 9. 3. 3 | ranged from 1/3 in East Germany to 1/6 in the UK (Bochow
132 II, 9. 4. 3 | EU country, followed by Germany and Greece. There are more
133 II, 9. 4. 3 | Kingdom) or increasing (Germany and France). The data also
134 II, 9. 4. 7 | Cancer Conference, Hamburg, Germany, Breast Cancer Res. 2004,
135 II, 9. 5. 3 | Rowntree, Foundation, 2006). In Germany it is calculated that 80%
136 II, 9. 5. 3 | a day) and the least in Germany and Belgium (around 6h:30
137 II, 9. 5. 3 | time in Finland (5h:30) and Germany (5h:24), and the least in
138 III, 10. 1. 3 | tale of two Germanies: East Germany’s health system provides
139 III, 10. 1. 3 | of evaluated projects in Germany. J Public Health 13(6):291-
140 III, 10. 2. 1 | epidemic - e.g. Denmark, Germany, Finland and the UK. In
141 III, 10. 2. 1 | increasing (ASPECT, 2004). Germany, for example, showed a decrease
142 III, 10. 2. 1 | all-cause mortality in south Germany. Results from the MONICA
143 III, 10. 2. 1 | of their smaller heads. Germany accounts for 18.5% of the
144 III, 10. 2. 1 | Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland,
145 III, 10. 2. 1 | active in the Netherlands and Germany to less than a quarter in
146 III, 10. 2. 1 | obesity ranges between US$ 17 (Germany, 2001) and US$ 202 (France,
147 III, 10. 2. 1 | Lavoisier ed. Paris 2000~Germany~German Nutrition Survey~ ~
148 III, 10. 2. 1 | Netherlands, the United Kingdom, Germany, Denmark, Sweden, Norway,
149 III, 10. 2. 1(24)| Roche de l’Obésité, 2006), Germany (Federal Statistical Office,
150 III, 10. 3. 1 | myocardial infarctions in Germany might be attributable to
151 III, 10. 3. 4 | Million US $ damage each, Germany 1650 Million US $ and Spain
152 III, 10. 4. 1 | made in the former East Germany, an association was found
153 III, 10. 4. 1 | and towns in former East Germany are typical examples. When
154 III, 10. 4. 1 | case study, the former East Germany and the Atlanta case. There
155 III, 10. 4. 1 | years in the former East Germany.~One of the best examples
156 III, 10. 4. 1 | working group meeting, Bonn, Germany 15-16 January 2004. Available
157 III, 10. 4. 1 | Working Group meeting, Bonn, Germany 18-20 October 2005. Available
158 III, 10. 4. 2 | Norway, United Kingdom, Germany, USA, Canada). The public
159 III, 10. 4. 2 | für Risikobewertung BfR~Germany~ΕΝΙΑΙΟΣ ΦΟΡΕΑΣ ΕΛΕΓΧΟΥ ΤΡΟΦΙΜΩΝ
160 III, 10. 4. 5 | following the re-unification of Germany.~ ~Figure 10.4.5.2.2a. Total
161 III, 10. 5. 1 | Working Group Meeting Bonn, Germany 23-24 October 2006. WHO
162 III, 10. 5. 2 | settlement category, while in Germany the mortality increase and
163 III, 10. 5. 2 | Powles et al, 2002).~ ~Within Germany, data from children health
164 III, 10. 5. 2 | lifestyle factors, data from Germany suggests that smoking is
165 III, 10. 5. 2 | Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg,
166 III, 10. 5. 2 | conditions in East and West Germany. BMC Public Health 2006,
167 III, 10. 5. 2 | in smoking behaviour in Germany. BMC Public Health 2006,
168 III, 10. 5. 3 | activities. E.g. in Belgium and Germany compensation is still caused
169 III, 10. 5. 3(43)| Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Germany, Italy, Portugal, Switzerland~
170 III, 10. 5. 3 | Slovenia, Slovak Republic and Germany, which are experiencing
171 III, 10. 5. 3 | safety. In Austria, France, Germany, United Kingdom, the Netherlands
172 III, 10. 5. 3 | Many Member States, such as Germany, Belgium and France, have
173 III, 10. 5. 3 | Finland, the Netherlands, Germany and Belgium are among the
174 III, 10. 6. 1 | States (Finland, France, Germany, Greece) and Norway. Social
175 IV, 11. 1. 3 | competitive sickness funds e.g. Germany and the Netherlands;~3)
176 IV, 11. 1. 3 | prescription drug budgets (e.g. in Germany).~ ~Despite some success
177 IV, 11. 1. 4 | Austria, Belgium, France, Germany, Luxembourg and Switzerland (
178 IV, 11. 1. 4 | Spain, Greece, Austria, Germany, the Netherlands for the
179 IV, 11. 1. 5 | mechanisms (Shaw, 2003). In Germany, health insurance funds
180 IV, 11. 1. 5 | e.g. in Slovakia, Hungary, Germany).~ ~Eurobarometer surveys
181 IV, 11. 1. 6 | Salary.~Fee-for-service.~Germany~100% by fee-for-service.~
182 IV, 11. 1. 6 | England, France, Finland, Germany, Hungary, Ireland, Italy,
183 IV, 11. 1. 6 | Denmark, England, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, the Netherlands,
184 IV, 11. 1. 6 | hospitals using DRGs), Italy, Germany and Spain include those
185 IV, 11. 1. 6 | administrative costs (i.e. Germany, Luxembourg, the Netherlands),
186 IV, 11. 1. 6 | administrative costs of PHI in Germany, Luxembourg, the Netherlands
187 IV, 11. 2. 1 | Portugal, France, Scotland and Germany (Castoro et al, 2007).~ ~
188 IV, 11. 2. 1 | with the highest supply are Germany (829), the Czech Republic (
189 IV, 11. 2. 1 | 11.5). The exceptions are Germany, Greece and the Netherlands,
190 IV, 11. 3. 1 | Greece, Norway, Poland, Germany and Slovakia. There seems
191 IV, 11. 3. 1 | countries in Europe, Austria, Germany, Switzerland, and to some
192 IV, 11. 3. 1 | students graduating in France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Spain and
193 IV, 11. 3. 1 | are present in Austria and Germany. Financial incentives linked
194 IV, 11. 3. 1 | nine countries - France, Germany, Lithuania, Malta, Norway,
195 IV, 11. 3. 2 | Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy,
196 IV, 11. 3. 2 | in Western Europe except Germany and the UK.~ ~Reference
197 IV, 11. 3. 2 | pharmacotherapeutic effects (as in Germany and the Netherlands) or
198 IV, 11. 3. 2 | Czech Republic and Slovakia. In Germany and France cost-effectiveness
199 IV, 11. 3. 2 | as in Finland, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg,
200 IV, 11. 3. 2 | prescribing budgets in the UK and Germany, or prescribing guidelines
201 IV, 11. 3. 2 | to society is highest in Germany, followed by Denmark, Ireland
202 IV, 11. 5. 1 | such as Eurotransplant (Germany, Austria, Belgium, The Netherlands,
203 IV, 11. 5. 2 | Eurotransplant: Austria , Belgium , Germany , Luxemburg, the Netherlands ,
204 IV, 11. 6. 1 | Iceland and Portugal to match Germany’s at over 10% of GDP. Meanwhile,
205 IV, 11. 6. 1 | countries, such as France, Germany and Switzerland do not come
206 IV, 11. 6. 2 | also in Finland, France, Germany and Portugal (OECD Health
207 IV, 11. 6. 2 | Belgium, the Czech Republic, Germany, Hungary, Luxembourg, the
208 IV, 11. 6. 2 | insurance (e.g. France, Germany, the Netherlands) and also
209 IV, 11. 6. 2 | For example France and Germany increased their reliance
210 IV, 11. 6. 2 | Austria, Belgium, France, Germany, Luxembourg, the Netherlands,
211 IV, 11. 6. 2 | Austria, the Czech Republic, Germany, Greece, Lithuania, Slovakia
212 IV, 11. 6. 2 | Austria, the Czech Republic, Germany, Greece and Slovakia, though
213 IV, 11. 6. 2 | Czech Republic, Belgium, Germany, the Netherlands, and Slovakia
214 IV, 11. 6. 2 | efficiency. All countries except Germany and Greece set contribution
215 IV, 11. 6. 2 | centrally, though from 2009 Germany will also have a centrally
216 IV, 11. 6. 2 | collected did not increase). In Germany it has similarly been argued
217 IV, 11. 6. 2 | Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg,
218 IV, 11. 6. 2 | state, and is available in Germany and the Netherlands (until
219 IV, 11. 6. 2 | of private expenditure in Germany (40%) and the Netherlands (
220 IV, 11. 6. 2 | employees in Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Italy, Luxembourg,
221 IV, 11. 6. 2 | Thomson et al, 2003), and in Germany a co-payment was introduced
222 IV, 11. 6. 2 | stays longer than 14 days in Germany or 28 days in Austria. For
223 IV, 11. 6. 2 | 5-10 in Austria, France, Germany and Luxembourg, to €26-65
224 IV, 11. 6. 2 | of utilization, e.g. in Germany and France where co-payments
225 IV, 11. 6. 2 | chronic conditions:~- France~- Germany~- Ireland~- Italy~- Latvia~-
226 IV, 11. 6. 2 | Belgium~- Cyprus~- France~- Germany~- Greece~- Hungary~- Ireland~-
227 IV, 11. 6. 2 | Estonia~- Finland~- France~- Germany~- Italy~- Latvia~- Lithuania~-
228 IV, 11. 6. 3 | system. Income tax in France, Germany, the Netherlands, Sweden
229 IV, 11. 6. 3 | insurance like the Netherlands, Germany, Switzerland and the US (
230 IV, 11. 6. 3 | are not obliged - as in Germany - to stay in the public
231 IV, 11. 6. 3 | and Van Ourti, 2003). In Germany, about 21% of the population
232 IV, 11. 6. 3 | health insurance systems in Germany and the Netherlands have
233 IV, 11. 6. 3 | followed by Denmark and Germany, reducing inequalities by
234 IV, 11. 6. 3 | studied in greater depth in Germany. Three types of interpersonal
235 IV, 11. 6. 3 | redistribution are seen in Germany: (1) due to varying health
236 IV, 11. 6. 3 | progressive in Denmark, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands,
237 IV, 11. 6. 4 | Mossialos 2008). In Austria and Germany (with 21 and about 290 insurance
238 IV, 11. 6. 4 | Czech Republic, Slovakia, Germany and the Netherlands). For
239 IV, 11. 6. 4 | insurance systems, such as Germany and the Netherlands, and
240 IV, 11. 6. 4 | five countries (Belgium, Germany, Israel, the Netherlands
241 IV, 11. 6. 4 | Sécurité Sociale~25 regions~age~Germany~355 sickness funds~Federal
242 IV, 11. 6. 4 | particular in the case of Germany. The situation is complex
243 IV, 11. 6. 4 | no regulation in France, Germany and Switzerland (Gibis et
244 IV, 11. 6. 4 | medical devices, and all but Germany (implicit) do so for pharmaceuticals.
245 IV, 11. 6. 4 | social courts’ in Austria and Germany, or civil courts in Belgium
246 IV, 11. 6. 5 | Income redistribution under Germany's statutory health insurance
247 IV, 12. 5 | Austria, Belgium, Finland, Germany and Italy appeared to experience
248 IV, 12. 5 | compression of disability whilst Germany, Ireland, the Netherlands
249 IV, 12. 8 | Latvia (2004)~Romania (2007)~Germany (1957)~Lithuania (2004)~
250 IV, 12. 10 | determinants~ ~ ~ ~ ~COUNTRY: Germany~ ~ ~A) Prevention and control
251 IV, 12. 10 | NAP, national action plan “Germany fit for children”), masterminded
252 IV, 12. 10 | workplaces or sports clubs.~“Germany is moving” (Deutschland
253 IV, 12. 10 | have a long tradition in Germany. Several laws and acts support
254 IV, 12. 10 | waste management policy in Germany. Through this the conditions
255 IV, 12. 10 | industrialised countries - including Germany - the production and use
256 IV, 12. 10 | and environmental dangers. Germany has ratified the Stockholm
257 IV, 12. 10 | contamination of foodstuff in Germany is low. The results of the
258 IV, 12. 10 | safeguarding of Food safety in Germany is under the shared responsibility
259 IV, 12. 10 | monitored by different bodies in Germany. The Federal Agency for
260 IV, 12. 10 | National Action Plan for a Germany suitable for children (Nationaler
261 IV, 12. 10 | people.~Forum health targets Germany (Forum Gesundheitsziele
262 IV, 13. 7. 2 | Sweden, Finland, Denmark and Germany. These are followed by the
263 Key, Ap5. 0. 0 | genders~genital~geriatric~Germany~gestation~giardia~giardiasis~
|
|
| |
