Part,  Chapter, Paragraph

 1    -,     1        | Organizations (Appendix 1); (iii) reviewed by the experts listed in
 2    I,     2.  9    |         health have been recently reviewed in a EEA Report (EEA, 2008).~ ~
 3   II,     5.  5.  3|          and van Hoeken, 2003).~ ~Reviewed articles and studies by
 4   II,     5.  5.  3|       that the evidence level for reviewed studies is predominantly
 5   II,     5.  5.  3|        description and analysis~ ~Reviewed articles and studies by
 6   II,     5.  5.  3|       2004).~Berkman et al (2007) reviewed various surveys, which were
 7   II,     5.  5.  3|         32 separate studies) were reviewed. The review analysed indicators
 8   II,     5.  5.  3|          that of MS mortality was reviewed for Europe with regards
 9   II,     5.  6.  2|      databases have been recently reviewed for the following reports:~ ~·
10   II,     5.  8.  2|          papers published on peer reviewed journals~- Lung Health in
11   II,     5.  9. FB|          papers published on peer reviewed journals~- GA2LEN~- EFA-European
12   II,     5.  9.  2|          papers published in peer reviewed journals;~- The Quality
13   II,     5.  9.  3|           in 13 of the 20 studies reviewed, a decreasing or stable
14   II,     5. 12.  1|            we have systematically reviewed mortality from cirrhosis
15   II,     6.  3.  3|         practices will have to be reviewed on how to improve these
16   II,     6.  3.  6|          surveillance needs to be reviewed with regard to food-borne
17   II,     8.  1.  5|        Progress will be regularly reviewed and new priorities identified
18   II,     9.  2.  6|        Programmes will need to be reviewed to counter renewed outbreaks.~ ~
19   II,     9.  3.  1|       women from the 36 countries reviewed, with the median death rate
20  III,    10.  3.  1|            among others, were all reviewed.~ ~The Montreal Protocol
21  III,    10.  3.  2|          EEA assessments are peer reviewed and quality checked by scientific
22  III,    10.  3.  4|           published literature as reviewed by Ahern et al , we can
23  III,    10.  4.  1|          EEA assessments are peer reviewed and quality checked by scientific
24  III,    10.  4.  2|          date and relevant, it is reviewed every six months.~ ~The
25  III,    10.  4.  3|      Directive is currently being reviewed, although a revised version
26  III,    10.  5.  2|      rural settings. Based on the reviewed evidence, it seems that
27  III,    10.  6.  2|           appointed in 1997, that reviewed the current state of health
28   IV,    12.  3    |                         12.3. The reviewed European social agenda~ ~
29   IV,    12.  3    |       July 2008, the EC adopted a reviewed social agenda aimed in particular