Part,  Chapter, Paragraph

  1    I,     2.  9        |     cyanobacteria in phytoplankton communities, resulting in increased
  2   II,     4.  1        |         Commission of the European Communities, 2005).~ ~However, the significant
  3   II,     4.  3        |         Commission of the European Communities (2005): 2005 Commission
  4   II,     5.  4.  1    |           common among the poorest communities: deprivation, lack of sanitation,
  5   II,     5.  5.  1    |        2004). Luxembourg: European Communities and STAKES, 2004.~ ~European
  6   II,     5.  5.  1    |       against depression. European Communities, 2004. Also available online
  7   II,     5.  5.  3    |            old children in the six communities studied. The 2002 study
  8   II,     5.  5.  3    |           in 150 children in these communities. This is consistent with
  9   II,     5.  5.  3    |       published studies, with some communities having an estimate higher
 10   II,     5.  6.  3    |        varies considerably between communities and may influence the epidemiology
 11   II,     5.  7.Acr    |            Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities~CKD~Chronic Kidney Disease~
 12   II,     5.  7.  3    |            Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study in the USA,
 13   II,     5.  7.  6    |            challenges individuals, communities, and professionals to take
 14   II,     5. 11.  4    |       chronic diseases when entire communities are considered. Various
 15   II,     5. 13        |         Commission of the European Communities, 2005; WHO, 2000). A body
 16   II,     5. 13        |         Commission of the European Communities, 2005). In 2002, the total
 17   II,     5. 14.  2    |      health surveys or in specific communities including sample registration
 18   II,     5. 14.  7    |            ageing people, deprived communities are not only less likely
 19   II,     7.  4.  7    |          is more prevalent in some communities than in others. Violence
 20   II,     9.  2.  7    |       Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg~ ~European Commission (
 21   II,     9.  3.  1    |       visible in the most affected communities, particularly among blood
 22   II,     9.  3.  1    |       Publications of the European Communities.~ ~Falzon D and Belghiti
 23   II,     9.  3.  1    |           European Union. European Communities & WHO July 2002~ ~WHO/GENACIS (
 24   II,     9.  3.  3    |       HIV/AIDS in Europe’s migrant communities, and ethnic minorities.
 25   II,     9.  5.  6    |       Publications of the European Communities. Available at: htt 3 (accessed
 26   II,     9.  5.  6    |      Publications for the European Communities. Luxembourg~ ~European Commission (
 27  III,    10.  2.  1    |           due to smoking (European Communities, 2002).~Mortality due to
 28  III,    10.  2.  1    |          and social effects on all communities worldwide. Fluoride reduces
 29  III,    10.  2.  1    |            support of oral health. Communities and countries with inappropriate
 30  III,    10.  2.  1    |      health surveys or in specific communities including sample registration
 31  III,    10.  2.  1    |          services in countries and communities and how people care for
 32  III,    10.  2.  1    |       advantaged and disadvantaged communities. Fluoride school based programmes
 33  III,    10.  2.  1    |         promotes the well-being of communities, especially in urban settings,
 34  III,    10.  2.  1    |           shaping environments and communities, such as transport, environment,
 35  III,    10.  2.  1    |         Commission of the European Communities (COM(2005) 637 final.~[ht ~ ~
 36  III,    10.  2.  1    |         Commission of the European Communities. [ht ~ ~European Commission (
 37  III,    10.  2.  1    |         Commission of the European Communities, 2005; WHO, 2000). A body
 38  III,    10.  2.  1    |         Commission of the European Communities, 2005). In 2002, the total
 39  III,    10.  2.  1    | Statistical Office of the European Communities, 2005a; Statistical Office
 40  III,    10.  2.  1    | Statistical Office of the European Communities, 2005b; Statistical Office
 41  III,    10.  2.  1    | Statistical Office of the European Communities, 2005c; Statistical Office
 42  III,    10.  2.  1    | Statistical Office of the European Communities, 2005d; Statistics Austria,
 43  III,    10.  2.  1(24)| Statistical Office of the European Communities, 2005d), Cyprus (Statistical
 44  III,    10.  2.  1(24)| Statistical Office of the European Communities, 2005c), Czech Republic (
 45  III,    10.  2.  1(24)| Statistical Office of the European Communities, 2005a), Slovakia (Statistical
 46  III,    10.  2.  1(24)| Statistical Office of the European Communities, 2005b), Slovenia (Zaletel-Kragelj
 47  III,    10.  2.  1    | Statistical Office of the European Communities, 2005a) and Estonia (45.
 48  III,    10.  2.  1    |         Commission of the European Communities, 2005; National Institute
 49  III,    10.  2.  1    |           shaping environments and communities, such as food industry,
 50  III,    10.  2.  1    |         Commission of the European Communities, 2007), monitoring and evaluation
 51  III,    10.  2.  1    |         Commission of the European Communities, 2007).~ ~In September 2007,
 52  III,    10.  2.  1    |         Commission of the European Communities, 2007).~ ~Action key areas
 53  III,    10.  2.  1    |         Commission of the European Communities (COM(2005): 637 final.~[ht ~ ~
 54  III,    10.  2.  1    |         Commission of the European Communities. [ht ] (report online, accessed
 55  III,    10.  2.  1    | Statistical Office of the European Communities (2005a): Health status indicators
 56  III,    10.  2.  1    | Statistical Office of the European Communities. [database online, accessed
 57  III,    10.  2.  1    | Statistical Office of the European Communities (2005b): Health status indicators
 58  III,    10.  2.  1    | Statistical Office of the European Communities. [database online, accessed
 59  III,    10.  2.  1    | Statistical Office of the European Communities (2005c): Health status indicators
 60  III,    10.  2.  1    | Statistical Office of the European Communities. [database online, accessed
 61  III,    10.  2.  1    | Statistical Office of the European Communities (2005d): Health status indicators
 62  III,    10.  2.  1    | Statistical Office of the European Communities.~[database online, accessed
 63  III,    10.  2.  1    |         Commission of the European Communities, Directorate General, 1993~ ~
 64  III,    10.  3.  2    | Statistical Office of the European Communities~GDP~Gross Domestic Product~
 65  III,    10.  3.  4    |            terms of the ability of communities and individuals to cope
 66  III,    10.  3.  4    |     flooding, the vulnerability of communities is closely related to the
 67  III,    10.  4.  1    | Statistical Office of the European Communities~ExternE~Externalities of
 68  III,    10.  4.  2(38)|         Commission of the European Communities: Monitoring of Pesticide
 69  III,    10.  4.  2(40)|          Commission f the European Communities:Monitoring of Pesticides
 70  III,    10.  4.  2    |            Journal of the European Communities No. L 31/1, 1 February2002.
 71  III,    10.  4.  2    |            Journal of the European Communities No. L 338, 22 December 2005.
 72  III,    10.  4.  2    |            Journal of the European Communities No. L 043, 14 February 1997.
 73  III,    10.  4.  2    |            Council of the European Communities of 23 April 1990 on the
 74  III,    10.  4.  2    |            Journal of the European Communities No. L 117, 8 May 1990. Available
 75  III,    10.  4.  2    |            Journal of the European Communities No. L 106 , 17 April 2001.
 76  III,    10.  4.  2    |            Journal of the European Communities No. L 268/1, 18 October
 77  III,    10.  4.  2    |            Journal of the European Communities No. L 287/1, 5 November
 78  III,    10.  4.  2    |            Journal of the European Communities No. L 268/24, 18 October
 79  III,    10.  4.  2    |            Journal of the European Communities No. L 109, 6 May 2000. Available
 80  III,    10.  4.  2    |            Journal of the European Communities No. L 12/3, 18 January 2007
 81  III,    10.  4.  2    |            Journal of the European Communities No. L 404/26, 30 December
 82  III,    10.  4.  2    |            Journal of the European Communities No. L 183/51, 12 July 2002.
 83  III,    10.  4.  2    |            Journal of the European Communities No. L 52/19, 22 February
 84  III,    10.  4.  2    |            Journal of the European Communities No. L 83/14, 22 March 2006.~
 85  III,    10.  4.  2    |            Journal of the European Communities No. L 165, 30 April 2004.
 86  III,    10.  4.  2    |            Journal of the European Communities No. L 395, 30 December 1989.~ ~
 87  III,    10.  4.  2    |            Journal of the European Communities No. L 24, 30 January 1998,
 88  III,    10.  4.  2    |            Journal of the European Communities No. L 139, 30 April 2004.~ ~
 89  III,    10.  4.  2    |            Journal of the European Communities No. L 139, 30 April 2004.~ ~
 90  III,    10.  4.  2    |            Journal of the European Communities No. L 332, 30 December 1995.~ ~
 91  III,    10.  4.  5    | Statistical Office of the European Communities~HIA~Health impact assessment~
 92  III,    10.  4.  5    |            emissions to the nearby communities. As to the possible impact
 93  III,    10.  4.  5    |         relevant for the health of communities. Consideration of all relevant
 94  III,    10.  4.  5    |            still affect some local communities, support regulation and
 95  III,    10.  5.  1    |          the outbreaks occurred in communities with fewer than 500 inhabitants (
 96  III,    10.  5.  1    |            Journal of the European Communities, 1998, L 330(41):32 Available
 97  III,    10.  5.  1    |       Publications of the European Communities.~European Environment Agency (
 98  III,    10.  5.  1    |       Publications of the European Communities.~ ~Eurostat (various years):
 99  III,    10.  5.  1    | Statistical Office of the European Communities~IDB~Injury Database~ISARE~
100  III,    10.  5.  2    |           in some rather urbanized communities (Wood, 2004).~ ~Looking
101  III,    10.  5.  2    | Statistical Office of the European Communities~GDP~ Gross Domestic Product~
102  III,    10.  5.  3    |           to workers' families and communities.” (WHO, 2006)~This widened
103  III,    10.  5.  3    |         Commission of the European Communities: First Annual Report on
104  III,    10.  6.  2    |         health inequalities within communities. All project examples have
105  III,    10.  6.  3    |         social texture of affected communities. Interpersonal violence
106  III,    10.  6.  3    |          is more prevalent in some communities than in others.~ ~The inadequacy
107   IV,    11.  6.  4    |    Ministry of Health~7 autonomous communities~Cross-boundary flows, declining
108   IV,    11.  6.  5    |       Publications of the European Communities.~ ~Balabanova D, McKee M (
109   IV,    11.  6.  5    |         Commission of the European Communities.~ ~van de Ven W, Beck K
110   IV,    12. 10        |           self-help organizations, communities etc.):~w – internet platform
111   IV,    12. 10        |           BMI), federal states and communities as improved local infrastructure (
112   IV,    12. 10        |        Regulations 2004~- European Communities (National Emissions Ceilings)
113   IV,    12. 10        |          Products 2007.~- European Communities (control of emissions of
114   IV,    12. 10        |    Regulations 2008~ ~ ~- European Communities (Good Agricultural Practice