Part, Chapter, Paragraph
1 II, 5. 2. 3| significantly both the functional outcome and the case fatality after
2 II, 5. 3. 1| in this chapter cancer outcome indicators are ordered by
3 II, 5. 3. 3| For this reason cancer outcome indicators (i.e. incidence,
4 II, 5. 3. 7| research, surveillance, and outcome monitoring, into strategies
5 II, 5. 4. 2| hospitals.~A particular case of outcome is that of mortality: HDRs
6 II, 5. 4. 2| may help to improve the outcome and reduce the cost of this
7 II, 5. 4. 2| is the most fundamental outcome indicator of all, through
8 II, 5. 4. 4| the height in meters. The outcome categories are: below 20
9 II, 5. 4. 4| alarming.~Overall, process and outcome indicators in diabetes seem
10 II, 5. 5. 3| roles – is an important outcome measure for people with
11 II, 5. 5. 3| partner etc. Therefore, social outcome should be given more prominence
12 II, 5. 5. 3| The importance of social outcome is also reflected in the
13 II, 5. 5. 3| disease course and poorer outcome. Physical co-morbidity accounts
14 II, 5. 5. 3| impact of co-morbidity on outcome, one must be aware that
15 II, 5. 5. 3| carried out worldwide; the outcome suggests a precautionary
16 II, 5. 5. 3| B (1997): Suicide as an outcome for mental disorders. A
17 II, 5. 5. 3| biases with respect to future outcome. This may account for an
18 II, 5. 5. 3| these might have a long-term outcome.~Secondary prevention~ ~
19 II, 5. 6. 3| also risk factors for poor outcome of fracture (Woolf and Akesson,
20 II, 5. 6. 3| report a good functional outcome at 6 months (Kaukonen et
21 II, 5. 6. 3| fractures and a determinant of outcome (Cooper, 1997; Sernbo and
22 II, 5. 6. 6| community based series of better outcome in rheumatoid arthritis.
23 II, 5. 6. 6| other factors affecting the outcome. Ann Chir Gynaecol 77:27-
24 II, 5. 7. 4| incidence of RRT is the outcome of a complex interplay of
25 II, 5. 9. FB| middle childhood on the outcome of subsequent asthma, showed
26 II, 5. 11. 5| collated and analyzed. The outcome of this initiative will
27 II, 7. 3. 5| itself, irrespective of the outcome it produces. Interpersonal
28 II, 7. 4. 6| products.~ ~As suicide is an outcome of complex interactions
29 II, 8. 1. 1| functioning arise as the outcome of interactions between
30 II, 9 | both short- and long-term outcome for mothers and children
31 II, 9 | determinants of health and outcome in the elderly (Volkert,
32 II, 9. 1. 1| data relating to pregnancy outcome and maternity care date
33 II, 9. 1. 1| maternal age on obstetric outcome. Obstet Gynecol 2005;105(
34 II, 9. 1. 1| and smoking on pregnancy outcome: a population-based study.
35 II, 9. 1. 1| 65-9.~ ~Doyle LW (2001): Outcome at 5 years of age of children
36 II, 9. 1. 1| plurality and growth on neonatal outcome compared with singleton
37 II, 9. 1. 1| disparities in pregnancy outcome: why do the poor fare so
38 II, 9. 1. 1| Kisly A (1995): Pregnancy outcome in nulliparous women 35
39 II, 9. 1. 2| livebirth is the most common outcome, infant survival is high,
40 II, 9. 1. 2| both short- and long-term outcome for mothers and children
41 II, 9. 1. 2| intensive care have improved the outcome in terms of survival and
42 II, 9. 1. 2| information on the likely outcome for the anomaly which has
43 II, 9. 1. 2| currently available on long term outcome for the child and family
44 II, 9. 1. 2| prevention, and improving the outcome of affected children and
45 II, 9. 2. 2| reporting on a particular health outcome. Food and alcohol consumption
46 II, 9. 2. 3| health uncovered. As an outcome measure of service failure,
47 II, 9. 3. 1| may affect the need and outcome of a variety of periodontal
48 II, 9. 3. 2| conception to 42 days after the outcome of the pregnancy. This means
49 II, 9. 3. 2| 43 and 365 days after the outcome of pregnancy) deaths are
50 II, 9. 3. 2| maternal age on obstetric outcome. Obstet Gynecol 2005;105(
51 II, 9. 3. 2| and smoking on pregnancy outcome: a population-based study.
52 II, 9. 3. 2| 65-9.~ ~Doyle LW (2001): Outcome at 5 years of age of children
53 II, 9. 3. 2| plurality and growth on neonatal outcome compared with singleton
54 II, 9. 3. 2| disparities in pregnancy outcome: why do the poor fare so
55 II, 9. 3. 2| Kisly A (1995): Pregnancy outcome in nulliparous women 35
56 II, 9. 3. 3| recommends the following outcome indicators to monitor and
57 II, 9. 4. 4| determinants of health and outcome in the elderly (Volkert,
58 II, 9. 4. 7| care and determinants of outcome. Age and Ageing; Volume
59 III, 10. 1 | determinants and a particular outcome of interest, and act as
60 III, 10. 1. 1| determinant and the health outcome of interest or act as an
61 III, 10. 2. 1| of health.~ ~An important outcome of the EFCOSUM project was
62 III, 10. 4. 2| programme performed and its outcome. The specifications laid
63 III, 10. 4. 2| substances for which the outcome of the evaluation is favourable
64 III, 10. 4. 2| provide confidence in the outcome of a risk-benefit analysis,
65 III, 10. 4. 2| the uncertainties in the outcome should be made very clear.
66 III, 10. 4. 2| activity to harmonize the outcome.~ ~Risk communication~ ~
67 III, 10. 4. 5| mortality and reproductive outcome such as birth defects and
68 III, 10. 5. 2| origin, the specific health outcome and the definition of rural areas
69 III, 10. 5. 3| attributable risks for specific outcome – risk factor associations,
70 IV, 11. 1. 1| instrumental and final (outcome) goals. For the former these
71 IV, 11. 1. 5| be structure, process or outcome oriented, thereby differing
72 IV, 11. 1. 5| themselves. Examples of outcome target include the setting
73 IV, 11. 1. 5| who may be skewing health outcome data (Mossialos et al, 2007).~ ~
74 IV, 11. 5. 4| of favourable transplant outcome and low donor risk.~The
75 IV, 11. 5. 5| for organ donation and its outcome and define the limits of
76 IV, 11. 6. 4| developed”. Of interest is that outcome research is the “research
77 IV, 11. 6. 4| Kane, 1997).~Indeed, the outcome of a specific procedure
78 IV, 11. 6. 4| or environment..~Through outcome research it is possible
79 IV, 11. 6. 4| affect the measures of the outcome (that is, “a factor that
80 IV, 11. 6. 4| effect of the exposure on the outcome of interest. In case of
81 IV, 11. 6. 4| between the exposure and the outcome will be different in the
82 IV, 11. 6. 4| Morrow, 1989). In some cases, outcome indicators could be expressed
83 IV, 11. 6. 4| The European Public Health Outcome Research and Indicators
84 IV, 11. 6. 4| defining a common set of outcome indicators in a few clinically
85 IV, 11. 6. 4| miscellanea) and a list of 54 outcome indicators adopted in European
86 IV, 11. 6. 4| to compute the selected outcome indicators, the type of
87 IV, 11. 6. 4| determine quality of healthcare outcome in myocardial infarction
88 IV, 11. 6. 4| describe how to develop outcome indicators for arthroplasty,
89 IV, 12. 10 | from the ROSIE (Research Outcome~Study in Ireland - Evaluating
90 IV, 13. 6. 2| answer satisfaction surveys. Outcome measures are difficult to
91 IV, 13. 6. 2| rates are, however, a good outcome measure. But in general,
92 Key, Ap5. 0. 0| osteoporosis~outbreak~outbreaks~outcome~outcomes~outdoor~out-of-pocket~
