Part,  Chapter, Paragraph

 1   II,     5.  3.  6|         survival was 80%. England, Scotland, Wales, Denmark, Malta and
 2   II,     5.  3.  6|           Malta, Poland, Portugal, Scotland, Slovakia, Slovenia and
 3   II,     5.  4.  2|        example is that of Tayside, Scotland (Morris et al 1997; Boyle
 4   II,     5.  4.  2|      sources. The case of Tayside, Scotland provides a good example
 5   II,     5.  4.  3|            from 4 (Cyprus) to 149 (Scotland) per 100,000, with a median
 6   II,     5.  4.  3|       between 3 (Belgium) and 632 (Scotland), with a median of 304 every
 7   II,     5.  4.  3|         between countries from 5% (Scotland) to 94% (Cyprus), with a
 8   II,     5.  4.  3|           lowest percentage was in Scotland where the treatment of elevated
 9   II,     5.  4.  3|         from 16% (Ireland) to 84% (Scotland), with a median value of
10   II,     5.  4.  3|            countries vary from 6% (Scotland) to 42% (Cyprus), with a
11   II,     5.  4.  3|           of 11% (Ireland) to 51% (Scotland) of the population, with
12   II,     5.  4.  3|        corresponding to Sweden and Scotland. A total of 7 countries
13   II,     5.  4.  3|         countries, varies from 78 (Scotland) to 574 (Spain) per 100,
14   II,     5.  4.  4|         are not easy to interpret (Scotland more than 30 times the dialysis/
15   II,     5.  4.  8|            and research in Tayside Scotland (DARTS) study: electronic
16   II,     5.  5.  2|           with dementia (Alzheimer Scotland, 2006).~ ~Dementia tends
17   II,     5.  5.  2|           so far, only Germany and Scotland (as part of the United Kingdom
18   II,     5.  5.  2|        limited to the territory of Scotland should the Convention ever
19   II,     5.  5.  2|       Alzheimer Europe~ ~Alzheimer Scotland (2006): Good for you – good
20   II,     5.  5.  2|            and dementia, Alzheimer Scotland. [on-line publication available
21   II,     5.  5.  3|            Sweden, United Kingdom, Scotland and Wales, Switzerland,
22   II,     5.  5.  3|          French), Hungary, Israel, Scotland, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland,
23   II,     5.  5.  3|            Sweden, United Kingdom, Scotland and Wales, Switzerland,
24   II,     5.  5.  3| latitudinal gradient to level off. Scotland’s rates are at least twice
25   II,     5.  5.  3|            comparable with that in Scotland, probably because of the
26   II,     5.  5.  3|         Ireland, Northern Ireland, Scotland, and Norway, where prevalence
27   II,     5.  5.  3|  registered registered in Finland, Scotland, Norway and Sardinia, insular
28   II,     5.  5.  3|          are reported for Denmark, Scotland, The Netherlands, Switzerland,
29   II,     5.  5.  3|     multiple sclerosis in Tayside, Scotland: do latitudinal gradients
30   II,     5.  5.  3|            sclerosis in South East Scotland: evidence of a genetic predisposition.
31   II,     5.  7.  5|            NHS Quality Improvement Scotland (QIS) does this in Scotland.
32   II,     5.  7.  5|        Scotland (QIS) does this in Scotland. The UK Renal Association
33   II,     5. 11.  3|           lower rates in Wales and Scotland.~ ~Contact dermatitis and
34   II,     5. 12.  1|      reported in the UK, mainly in Scotland (Leon and McCambridge, 2006).~
35   II,     5. 12.  2|  separately England and Wales, and Scotland. European Union (EU) as
36   II,     5. 12.  3|         and Wales from 3.6 to 8.9, Scotland from 7.8 to 20.3, Bulgaria
37   II,     5. 12.  3|          men and +7% in women from Scotland and around +9% in men and +
38   II,     5. 12.  3|            Ireland, the UK (mainly Scotland), and in a few countries
39   II,     5. 12.  4|           and the UK (particularly Scotland) over the last two decades40   II,     9        |             Ireland, Italy, Malta, Scotland and the Former Yugoslav
41   II,     9.  2.  3|      children as high as 18.4% for Scotland, 16.8% for Wales, 15.3%
42   II,     9.  2.  3|    Czech Republic, Ireland, Malta, Scotland, Slovenia, Sweden and Wales
43   II,     9.  2.  4|             Ireland, Italy, Malta, Scotland and the Former Yugoslav
44   II,     9.  3.  3|         England, Finland, Germany, Scotland, Sweden, Wales); however,
45   II,     9.  4.  3|           both England & Wales and Scotland, show higher rates in the
46   II,     9.  5.  4|    documents in England and Wales, Scotland, Ireland, Denmark or the
47   II,     9.  5.  6|         health and inequalities in Scotland. Scottish Development Centre
48  III,    10.  2.  1|           United Kingdom (England, Scotland and Wales) as well as Ukraine
49  III,    10.  2.  1|             Jotangia et al, 2005), Scotland (Bromley et al, 2005a; Bromley
50  III,    10.  2.  1|    Department of Health, 2006) and Scotland (UK) (Bromley et al, 2005a)
51  III,    10.  4.  2|       catch~limits for scallops in~Scotland~ ~Van Apeldoorn et al.,~
52  III,    10.  5.  2|          Roel et al., 2005).~ ~For Scotland, surveys found that patients
53  III,    10.  5.  2|           rural areas in Northeast Scotland: prospective observational
54   IV,    11.  2.  1|         rates in Portugal, France, Scotland and Germany (Castoro et
55   IV,    11.  6.  4|            mix of population risks~Scotland~HM Revenue and Customs (